PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LVHI vs. RTH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LVHI vs. RTH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI) and VanEck Vectors Retail ETF (RTH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LVHI achieves a 13.78% return, which is significantly higher than RTH's 4.33% return.


LVHI

1D
0.49%
1M
0.84%
YTD
13.78%
6M
14.96%
1Y
32.13%
3Y*
21.52%
5Y*
15.97%
10Y*

RTH

1D
-0.06%
1M
-1.59%
YTD
4.33%
6M
2.84%
1Y
12.87%
3Y*
16.16%
5Y*
9.69%
10Y*
14.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LVHI vs. RTH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LVHI
Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF
13.78%27.12%14.81%17.45%3.84%18.19%-8.76%18.35%-5.22%12.26%
RTH
VanEck Vectors Retail ETF
4.33%12.36%20.02%20.07%-17.67%24.94%31.62%29.06%3.87%22.45%

Correlation

The correlation between LVHI and RTH is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 28, 2016

0.48

The correlation between LVHI and RTH shifts across timeframes, from 0.38 (1 year) to 0.50 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

LVHI vs. RTH - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
LVHI
RTH

Financial Services

24.1%

-

Energy

16.6%

-

Industrials

13.4%
2.6%

Utilities

10.0%

-

Consumer Defensive

8.6%
26.8%

Healthcare

7.4%
13.4%

Basic Materials

6.8%

-

Communication Services

5.8%

-

Consumer Cyclical

5.5%
57.2%

Real Estate

1.8%

-

Technology

0.1%

-

Financial Services

LVHI
24.1%
RTH

-

Energy

LVHI
16.6%
RTH

-

Industrials

LVHI
13.4%
RTH
2.6%

Utilities

LVHI
10.0%
RTH

-

Consumer Defensive

LVHI
8.6%
RTH
26.8%

Healthcare

LVHI
7.4%
RTH
13.4%

Basic Materials

LVHI
6.8%
RTH

-

Communication Services

LVHI
5.8%
RTH

-

Consumer Cyclical

LVHI
5.5%
RTH
57.2%

Real Estate

LVHI
1.8%
RTH

-

Technology

LVHI
0.1%
RTH

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LVHI vs. RTH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LVHI
LVHI Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
LVHI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LVHI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
LVHI Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
LVHI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
LVHI Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

RTH
RTH Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
RTH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RTH Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
RTH Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
RTH Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
RTH Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LVHI vs. RTH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI) and VanEck Vectors Retail ETF (RTH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LVHIRTHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.63

1.18

+0.45

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.23

1.50

+3.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

21.61

4.99

+16.62

LVHI vs. RTH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LVHI Sharpe Ratio is 3.31, which is higher than the RTH Sharpe Ratio of 0.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LVHI and RTH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LVHI vs. RTH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LVHI drawdown since its inception was -32.31%, smaller than the maximum RTH drawdown of -42.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LVHI and RTH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LVHIRTHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.31%

-42.32%

+10.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.08%

-7.83%

+1.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.99%

-13.80%

+1.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.99%

-25.00%

+13.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-3.58%

+3.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.51%

-7.34%

+3.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.48%

2.35%

-0.87%

Volatility

LVHI vs. RTH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI) is 2.78%, while VanEck Vectors Retail ETF (RTH) has a volatility of 3.85%. This indicates that LVHI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RTH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LVHIRTHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.78%

3.85%

-1.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.72%

9.28%

-1.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.60%

12.09%

-2.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.08%

16.81%

-5.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.75%

17.54%

-3.79%

LVHI vs. RTH - Expense Ratio Comparison

LVHI has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than RTH's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

LVHI vs. RTH - Dividend Comparison

LVHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.69%, more than RTH's 0.93% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LVHI
Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF
4.69%4.92%3.98%8.12%7.74%4.13%3.97%6.67%10.67%3.38%2.02%0.00%
RTH
VanEck Vectors Retail ETF
0.93%0.97%0.77%1.07%1.16%0.78%0.64%0.91%1.05%1.56%1.84%2.25%

Frequently Asked Questions


LVHI and RTH have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RTH has higher volatility (3.85%) compared to LVHI (2.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LVHI dropped -32.31% vs RTH's -42.32%.

On 5-year performance, LVHI leads with 15.97% vs 9.69% for RTH. On fees, RTH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, LVHI has been the lower-risk option at 2.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, LVHI has performed better with a 15.97% return vs 9.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RTH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for LVHI.

LVHI has the higher dividend yield at 4.69%, compared with 0.93% for RTH.

LVHI is categorized as Volatility Hedged Equity, while RTH is Consumer Discretionary Equities. LVHI tracks Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Hedged Index-NR, while RTH tracks MVIS US Listed Retail 25 Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for LVHI and 0.35% for RTH.

LVHI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.31 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LVHI and RTH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer