LVHI vs. GNR
LVHI (Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF) and GNR (SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LVHI is a Volatility Hedged Equity fund tracking the Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Hedged Index-NR, while GNR is a Commodity Producers Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Natural Resources Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LVHI returned 15.97%/yr vs 9.29%/yr for GNR. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.40% expense ratio.
Performance
LVHI vs. GNR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LVHI achieves a 13.78% return, which is significantly lower than GNR's 17.34% return.
LVHI
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- 1.30%
- YTD
- 13.78%
- 6M
- 14.96%
- 1Y
- 31.64%
- 3Y*
- 21.52%
- 5Y*
- 15.97%
- 10Y*
- —
GNR
- 1D
- 1.21%
- 1M
- -3.83%
- YTD
- 17.34%
- 6M
- 18.86%
- 1Y
- 35.92%
- 3Y*
- 13.61%
- 5Y*
- 9.29%
- 10Y*
- 10.91%
LVHI vs. GNR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LVHI Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 13.78% | 27.12% | 14.81% | 17.45% | 3.84% | 18.19% | -8.76% | 18.35% | -5.22% | 12.26% |
GNR SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF | 17.34% | 28.68% | -8.27% | 2.95% | 10.20% | 24.73% | -0.03% | 16.49% | -13.19% | 22.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between LVHI and GNR is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 28, 2016 | 0.58 |
The correlation between LVHI and GNR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.
LVHI vs. GNR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
LVHI
GNR
Financial Services
Energy
Industrials
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Technology
-
Financial Services
LVHI
GNR
Energy
LVHI
GNR
Industrials
LVHI
GNR
Utilities
LVHI
GNR
Consumer Defensive
LVHI
GNR
Healthcare
LVHI
GNR
Basic Materials
LVHI
GNR
Communication Services
LVHI
GNR
-
Consumer Cyclical
LVHI
GNR
Real Estate
LVHI
GNR
Technology
LVHI
GNR
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LVHI vs. GNR — Risk / Return Rank
LVHI
GNR
LVHI vs. GNR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI) and SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF (GNR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LVHI | GNR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.63 | 1.37 | +0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.23 | 4.53 | +0.71 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 21.61 | 16.42 | +5.20 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LVHI vs. GNR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LVHI drawdown since its inception was -32.31%, smaller than the maximum GNR drawdown of -51.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LVHI and GNR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LVHI | GNR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.31% | -51.37% | +19.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.08% | -7.97% | +1.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.99% | -21.15% | +9.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -11.99% | -25.66% | +13.67% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -48.59% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -3.91% | +3.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.51% | -14.93% | +11.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.48% | 2.19% | -0.71% |
Volatility
LVHI vs. GNR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI) is 2.78%, while SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF (GNR) has a volatility of 5.75%. This indicates that LVHI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GNR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LVHI | GNR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.78% | 5.75% | -2.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.72% | 13.87% | -6.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.60% | 17.04% | -7.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.08% | 20.33% | -9.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.75% | 21.89% | -8.14% |
LVHI vs. GNR - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both LVHI and GNR have an expense ratio of 0.40%.
Dividends
LVHI vs. GNR - Dividend Comparison
LVHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.69%, more than GNR's 2.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GNR SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF | 2.53% | 2.76% | 4.73% | 3.37% | 4.37% | 3.44% | 2.78% | 3.84% | 3.51% | 2.40% | 2.06% | 4.59% |
LVHI Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 4.69% | 4.92% | 3.98% | 8.12% | 7.74% | 4.13% | 3.97% | 6.67% | 10.67% | 3.38% | 2.02% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LVHI and GNR have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GNR has higher volatility (5.75%) compared to LVHI (2.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LVHI dropped -32.31% vs GNR's -51.37%.
On 5-year performance, LVHI leads with 15.97% vs 9.29% for GNR. Both ETFs have the same 0.40% expense ratio. On volatility, LVHI has been the lower-risk option at 2.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, LVHI has performed better with a 15.97% return vs 9.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
LVHI and GNR have the same expense ratio: 0.40% per year.
LVHI has the higher dividend yield at 4.69%, compared with 2.53% for GNR.
LVHI is categorized as Volatility Hedged Equity, while GNR is Commodity Producers Equities. LVHI tracks Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Hedged Index-NR, while GNR tracks S&P Global Natural Resources Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and State Street.
LVHI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.31 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LVHI and GNR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer