LVHI vs. GDX
LVHI (Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF) and GDX (VanEck Gold Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LVHI is a Volatility Hedged Equity fund tracking the Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Hedged Index-NR, while GDX is a Gold fund tracking the NYSE MarketVector Global Gold Miners Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LVHI returned 15.67%/yr vs 17.28%/yr for GDX. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LVHI charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.51%/yr for GDX.
Performance
LVHI vs. GDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LVHI achieves a 11.45% return, which is significantly higher than GDX's -8.28% return.
LVHI
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- 0.77%
- YTD
- 11.45%
- 6M
- 13.55%
- 1Y
- 29.27%
- 3Y*
- 20.97%
- 5Y*
- 15.67%
- 10Y*
- —
GDX
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- -16.83%
- YTD
- -8.28%
- 6M
- 0.10%
- 1Y
- 53.51%
- 3Y*
- 37.89%
- 5Y*
- 17.28%
- 10Y*
- 12.82%
LVHI vs. GDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LVHI Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 11.45% | 27.12% | 14.81% | 17.45% | 3.84% | 18.19% | -8.76% | 18.35% | -5.22% | 12.26% |
GDX VanEck Gold Miners ETF | -8.28% | 154.77% | 10.63% | 9.98% | -9.01% | -9.52% | 23.66% | 39.84% | -8.77% | 11.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between LVHI and GDX is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 29, 2016 | 0.16 |
The correlation between LVHI and GDX shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (all time) to 0.33 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
LVHI vs. GDX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
LVHI
GDX
Financial Services
-
Energy
-
Industrials
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Basic Materials
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Financial Services
LVHI
GDX
-
Energy
LVHI
GDX
-
Industrials
LVHI
GDX
-
Utilities
LVHI
GDX
-
Consumer Defensive
LVHI
GDX
-
Healthcare
LVHI
GDX
-
Basic Materials
LVHI
GDX
Communication Services
LVHI
GDX
-
Consumer Cyclical
LVHI
GDX
-
Real Estate
LVHI
GDX
-
Technology
LVHI
GDX
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LVHI vs. GDX — Risk / Return Rank
LVHI
GDX
LVHI vs. GDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI) and VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LVHI | GDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.94 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.58 | 1.22 | +0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.84 | 1.68 | +3.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.99 | 4.32 | +15.66 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LVHI | GDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.10 | 1.16 | +1.94 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.42 | 0.47 | +0.95 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.35 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.81 | 0.12 | +0.70 |
Drawdowns
LVHI vs. GDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LVHI drawdown since its inception was -32.31%, smaller than the maximum GDX drawdown of -80.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LVHI and GDX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LVHI | GDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.31% | -80.34% | +48.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.08% | -32.09% | +26.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.99% | -32.09% | +20.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -11.99% | -46.51% | +34.52% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -49.79% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.79% | -32.09% | +30.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.52% | -40.43% | +36.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.47% | 12.42% | -10.95% |
Volatility
LVHI vs. GDX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI) is 2.35%, while VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) has a volatility of 16.05%. This indicates that LVHI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LVHI | GDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.35% | 16.05% | -13.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.58% | 38.61% | -31.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.50% | 46.36% | -36.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.07% | 36.61% | -25.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.76% | 37.27% | -23.51% |
LVHI vs. GDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LVHI has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than GDX's 0.51% expense ratio.
Dividends
LVHI vs. GDX - Dividend Comparison
LVHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.79%, more than GDX's 0.80% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDX VanEck Gold Miners ETF | 0.80% | 0.74% | 1.19% | 1.61% | 1.66% | 1.67% | 0.53% | 0.67% | 0.50% | 0.76% | 0.26% | 0.85% |
LVHI Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 4.79% | 4.92% | 3.98% | 8.12% | 7.74% | 4.13% | 3.97% | 6.67% | 10.67% | 3.38% | 2.02% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LVHI and GDX have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GDX has higher volatility (16.05%) compared to LVHI (2.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LVHI dropped -32.31% vs GDX's -80.34%.
On 5-year performance, GDX leads with 17.28% vs 15.67% for LVHI. On fees, LVHI is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, LVHI has been the lower-risk option at 2.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, GDX has performed better with a 17.28% return vs 15.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
LVHI is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.51% for GDX.
LVHI has the higher dividend yield at 4.79%, compared with 0.80% for GDX.
LVHI is categorized as Volatility Hedged Equity, while GDX is Gold. LVHI tracks Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Hedged Index-NR, while GDX tracks NYSE MarketVector Global Gold Miners Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for LVHI and 0.51% for GDX.
LVHI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.10 vs 1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LVHI and GDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer