LVHI vs. FDEM
LVHI (Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF) and FDEM (Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LVHI is a Volatility Hedged Equity fund tracking the Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Hedged Index-NR, while FDEM is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the Fidelity Targeted Emerging Markets Factor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LVHI returned 15.97%/yr vs 9.14%/yr for FDEM. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LVHI charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for FDEM.
Performance
LVHI vs. FDEM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LVHI achieves a 13.78% return, which is significantly lower than FDEM's 20.05% return.
LVHI
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- 0.84%
- YTD
- 13.78%
- 6M
- 14.96%
- 1Y
- 32.13%
- 3Y*
- 21.52%
- 5Y*
- 15.97%
- 10Y*
- —
FDEM
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- 0.88%
- YTD
- 20.05%
- 6M
- 22.29%
- 1Y
- 38.42%
- 3Y*
- 21.94%
- 5Y*
- 9.14%
- 10Y*
- —
LVHI vs. FDEM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LVHI Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 13.78% | 27.12% | 14.81% | 17.45% | 3.84% | 18.19% | -8.76% | 9.74% |
FDEM Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF | 20.05% | 26.75% | 9.34% | 17.26% | -13.11% | -3.52% | 8.87% | 5.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between LVHI and FDEM is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2019 | 0.53 |
The correlation between LVHI and FDEM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.43 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.
LVHI vs. FDEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
LVHI
FDEM
Financial Services
Energy
Industrials
Utilities
-
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
-
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Technology
Financial Services
LVHI
FDEM
Energy
LVHI
FDEM
Industrials
LVHI
FDEM
Utilities
LVHI
FDEM
-
Consumer Defensive
LVHI
FDEM
Healthcare
LVHI
FDEM
-
Basic Materials
LVHI
FDEM
Communication Services
LVHI
FDEM
Consumer Cyclical
LVHI
FDEM
Real Estate
LVHI
FDEM
Technology
LVHI
FDEM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LVHI vs. FDEM — Risk / Return Rank
LVHI
FDEM
LVHI vs. FDEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI) and Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF (FDEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LVHI | FDEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.99 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.63 | 1.36 | +0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.23 | 2.88 | +2.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 21.61 | 10.85 | +10.77 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LVHI vs. FDEM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LVHI drawdown since its inception was -32.31%, roughly equal to the maximum FDEM drawdown of -33.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LVHI and FDEM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LVHI | FDEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.31% | -33.65% | +1.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.08% | -12.70% | +6.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.99% | -16.04% | +4.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -11.99% | -28.47% | +16.48% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -3.51% | +3.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.51% | -8.82% | +5.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.48% | 3.37% | -1.89% |
Volatility
LVHI vs. FDEM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI) is 2.78%, while Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF (FDEM) has a volatility of 9.65%. This indicates that LVHI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LVHI | FDEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.78% | 9.65% | -6.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.72% | 16.93% | -9.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.60% | 18.94% | -9.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.08% | 16.48% | -5.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.75% | 18.10% | -4.35% |
LVHI vs. FDEM - Expense Ratio Comparison
LVHI has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than FDEM's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
LVHI vs. FDEM - Dividend Comparison
LVHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.69%, more than FDEM's 2.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDEM Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF | 2.72% | 3.23% | 4.05% | 4.41% | 3.95% | 2.71% | 1.84% | 2.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LVHI Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 4.69% | 4.92% | 3.98% | 8.12% | 7.74% | 4.13% | 3.97% | 6.67% | 10.67% | 3.38% | 2.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LVHI and FDEM have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FDEM has higher volatility (9.65%) compared to LVHI (2.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LVHI dropped -32.31% vs FDEM's -33.65%.
On 5-year performance, LVHI leads with 15.97% vs 9.14% for FDEM. On fees, LVHI is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, LVHI has been the lower-risk option at 2.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, LVHI has performed better with a 15.97% return vs 9.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
LVHI is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for FDEM.
LVHI has the higher dividend yield at 4.69%, compared with 2.72% for FDEM.
LVHI is categorized as Volatility Hedged Equity, while FDEM is Emerging Markets Equities. LVHI tracks Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Hedged Index-NR, while FDEM tracks Fidelity Targeted Emerging Markets Factor Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for LVHI and 0.45% for FDEM.
LVHI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.31 vs 1.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LVHI and FDEM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer