LVHI vs. ESPO
LVHI (Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF) and ESPO (VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LVHI is a Volatility Hedged Equity fund tracking the Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Hedged Index-NR, while ESPO is a Gaming fund tracking the MVIS Global Video Gaming and eSports Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LVHI returned 16.27%/yr vs 7.15%/yr for ESPO. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LVHI charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for ESPO.
Performance
LVHI vs. ESPO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LVHI achieves a 15.24% return, which is significantly higher than ESPO's -11.58% return.
LVHI
- 1D
- -0.50%
- 1M
- 2.64%
- 6M
- 11.66%
- YTD
- 15.24%
- 1Y
- 33.06%
- 3Y*
- 21.25%
- 5Y*
- 16.27%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 11.42%
ESPO
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- 3.78%
- 6M
- -13.33%
- YTD
- -11.58%
- 1Y
- -14.95%
- 3Y*
- 18.26%
- 5Y*
- 7.15%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 16.24%
LVHI vs. ESPO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LVHI Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 15.24% | 27.12% | 14.81% | 17.45% | 3.84% | 18.19% | -8.76% | 18.35% | -2.21% |
ESPO VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF | -11.58% | 25.79% | 47.61% | 33.64% | -34.71% | -2.13% | 83.93% | 42.36% | -12.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between LVHI and ESPO is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2018 | 0.42 |
The correlation between LVHI and ESPO shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (1 year) to 0.43 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
LVHI vs. ESPO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
LVHI
ESPO
Financial Services
-
Energy
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
-
Healthcare
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
-
Technology
Financial Services
LVHI
ESPO
-
Energy
LVHI
ESPO
-
Industrials
LVHI
ESPO
-
Consumer Defensive
LVHI
ESPO
-
Utilities
LVHI
ESPO
-
Healthcare
LVHI
ESPO
-
Basic Materials
LVHI
ESPO
-
Communication Services
LVHI
ESPO
Consumer Cyclical
LVHI
ESPO
Real Estate
LVHI
ESPO
-
Technology
LVHI
ESPO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LVHI vs. ESPO — Risk / Return Rank
LVHI
ESPO
LVHI vs. ESPO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI) and VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF (ESPO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LVHI | ESPO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +4.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +5.84 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.67 | 0.88 | +0.79 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.47 | -0.51 | +5.98 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 22.51 | -0.84 | +23.35 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LVHI vs. ESPO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LVHI drawdown since its inception was -32.31%, smaller than the maximum ESPO drawdown of -50.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LVHI and ESPO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LVHI | ESPO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.31% | -50.99% | +18.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.08% | -29.43% | +23.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.99% | -29.43% | +17.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -11.99% | -48.33% | +36.34% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.50% | -24.17% | +23.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.48% | -15.19% | +11.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.47% | 17.77% | -16.30% |
Volatility
LVHI vs. ESPO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI) is 2.14%, while VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF (ESPO) has a volatility of 4.77%. This indicates that LVHI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ESPO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LVHI | ESPO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.14% | 4.77% | -2.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.66% | 15.06% | -7.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.58% | 18.71% | -9.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.04% | 25.09% | -14.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.71% | 25.61% | -11.90% |
LVHI vs. ESPO - Expense Ratio Comparison
LVHI has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than ESPO's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
LVHI vs. ESPO - Dividend Comparison
LVHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.63%, more than ESPO's 1.41% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESPO VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF | 1.41% | 1.24% | 0.44% | 0.96% | 0.91% | 3.36% | 0.12% | 0.22% | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LVHI Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 4.63% | 4.92% | 3.98% | 8.12% | 7.74% | 4.13% | 3.97% | 6.67% | 10.67% | 3.38% | 2.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LVHI and ESPO have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ESPO has higher volatility (4.77%) compared to LVHI (2.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LVHI dropped -32.31% vs ESPO's -50.99%.
On 5-year performance, LVHI leads with 16.27% vs 7.15% for ESPO. On fees, LVHI is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, LVHI has been the lower-risk option at 2.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, LVHI has performed better with a 16.27% return vs 7.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
LVHI is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for ESPO.
LVHI has the higher dividend yield at 4.63%, compared with 1.41% for ESPO.
LVHI is categorized as Volatility Hedged Equity, while ESPO is Gaming. LVHI tracks Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Hedged Index-NR, while ESPO tracks MVIS Global Video Gaming and eSports Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for LVHI and 0.55% for ESPO.
LVHI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.47 vs -0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LVHI and ESPO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer