LVDS vs. SPYV
LVDS (JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF) and SPYV (SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LVDS is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by JPMorgan, while SPYV is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Value. LVDS is actively managed, while SPYV is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. LVDS charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SPYV.
Performance
LVDS vs. SPYV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LVDS achieves a 13.56% return, which is significantly higher than SPYV's 7.46% return.
LVDS
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- 3.85%
- YTD
- 13.56%
- 6M
- 14.52%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPYV
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- 2.22%
- YTD
- 7.46%
- 6M
- 7.77%
- 1Y
- 21.26%
- 3Y*
- 15.72%
- 5Y*
- 10.68%
- 10Y*
- 11.90%
LVDS vs. SPYV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LVDS JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF | 13.56% | 7.24% |
SPYV SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF | 7.46% | 8.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between LVDS and SPYV is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2025 | 0.91 |
LVDS vs. SPYV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
LVDS
SPYV
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Financial Services
LVDS
SPYV
Technology
LVDS
SPYV
Industrials
LVDS
SPYV
Healthcare
LVDS
SPYV
Consumer Cyclical
LVDS
SPYV
Communication Services
LVDS
SPYV
Energy
LVDS
SPYV
Consumer Defensive
LVDS
SPYV
Utilities
LVDS
SPYV
Real Estate
LVDS
SPYV
Basic Materials
LVDS
SPYV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LVDS vs. SPYV — Risk / Return Rank
LVDS
SPYV
LVDS vs. SPYV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF (LVDS) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LVDS | SPYV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.17 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.75 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.70 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.39 | 0.42 | +1.96 |
Drawdowns
LVDS vs. SPYV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LVDS drawdown since its inception was -6.64%, smaller than the maximum SPYV drawdown of -58.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LVDS and SPYV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LVDS | SPYV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.64% | -58.45% | +51.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.22% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -17.54% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -17.89% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.89% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.57% | +0.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.98% | -8.72% | +7.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.62% | — |
Volatility
LVDS vs. SPYV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LVDS | SPYV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.98% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.04% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.43% | 9.84% | +0.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.43% | 14.40% | -3.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.43% | 16.94% | -6.51% |
LVDS vs. SPYV - Expense Ratio Comparison
LVDS has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYV's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
LVDS vs. SPYV - Dividend Comparison
LVDS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.56%, more than SPYV's 1.70% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LVDS JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF | 7.56% | 8.25% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPYV SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF | 1.70% | 1.77% | 2.29% | 1.75% | 2.22% | 2.10% | 2.38% | 2.25% | 2.97% | 2.77% | 2.39% | 2.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, LVDS and SPYV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, SPYV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPYV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for LVDS.
LVDS has the higher dividend yield at 7.56%, compared with 1.70% for SPYV.
LVDS is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while SPYV is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for LVDS and 0.04% for SPYV.
Find the right allocation for LVDS and SPYV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer