PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LVAMX vs. FBLEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LVAMX vs. FBLEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in LSV U.S. Managed Volatility Fund (LVAMX) and Fidelity Series Stock Selector Large Cap Value Fund (FBLEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with LVAMX having a 9.86% return and FBLEX slightly higher at 10.35%. Over the past 10 years, LVAMX has underperformed FBLEX with an annualized return of 7.49%, while FBLEX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.11% annualized return.


LVAMX

1D
0.19%
1M
-2.19%
6M
9.86%
YTD
9.86%
1Y
16.24%
3Y*
9.81%
5Y*
6.58%
10Y*
7.49%

FBLEX

1D
0.39%
1M
1.84%
6M
10.35%
YTD
10.35%
1Y
20.75%
3Y*
18.43%
5Y*
12.14%
10Y*
12.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LVAMX vs. FBLEX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LVAMX
LSV U.S. Managed Volatility Fund
9.86%15.33%2.07%4.16%-2.66%20.97%-6.86%22.91%-2.17%13.52%
FBLEX
Fidelity Series Stock Selector Large Cap Value Fund
10.35%17.06%18.04%15.60%-4.82%26.83%4.34%25.57%-9.04%12.38%

Correlation

The correlation between LVAMX and FBLEX is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2014

0.89

The correlation between LVAMX and FBLEX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LVAMX vs. FBLEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LVAMX
LVAMX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
LVAMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LVAMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
LVAMX Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
LVAMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
LVAMX Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

FBLEX
FBLEX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
FBLEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBLEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBLEX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
FBLEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBLEX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LVAMX vs. FBLEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LSV U.S. Managed Volatility Fund (LVAMX) and Fidelity Series Stock Selector Large Cap Value Fund (FBLEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LVAMXFBLEXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.35

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.16

3.06

+0.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.81

12.29

-1.48

LVAMX vs. FBLEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LVAMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is comparable to the FBLEX Sharpe Ratio of 1.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LVAMX and FBLEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LVAMX vs. FBLEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LVAMX drawdown since its inception was -33.38%, smaller than the maximum FBLEX drawdown of -39.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LVAMX and FBLEX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LVAMXFBLEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.38%

-39.73%

+6.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.13%

-6.89%

+1.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.84%

-14.71%

-6.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.84%

-19.00%

-1.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.38%

-39.73%

+6.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.46%

-0.64%

-1.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.76%

-3.81%

-0.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.50%

1.71%

-0.21%

Volatility

LVAMX vs. FBLEX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for LSV U.S. Managed Volatility Fund (LVAMX) is 2.78%, while Fidelity Series Stock Selector Large Cap Value Fund (FBLEX) has a volatility of 3.49%. This indicates that LVAMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBLEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LVAMXFBLEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.78%

3.49%

-0.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.17%

8.25%

-1.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.84%

10.80%

-0.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.83%

14.79%

+1.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.11%

17.33%

-1.22%

LVAMX vs. FBLEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LVAMX has a 0.94% expense ratio, which is higher than FBLEX's 0.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

LVAMX vs. FBLEX - Dividend Comparison

LVAMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.25%, more than FBLEX's 10.06% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FBLEX
Fidelity Series Stock Selector Large Cap Value Fund
10.06%9.95%12.63%5.05%12.66%14.51%3.85%5.65%10.97%7.09%2.47%13.81%
LVAMX
LSV U.S. Managed Volatility Fund
19.25%21.15%3.30%17.00%10.71%6.62%3.15%9.37%6.98%3.79%1.98%2.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


LVAMX and FBLEX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FBLEX has higher volatility (3.49%) compared to LVAMX (2.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LVAMX dropped -33.38% vs FBLEX's -39.73%.

FBLEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LVAMX and FBLEX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer