PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LVAMX vs. NEIMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LVAMX vs. NEIMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in LSV U.S. Managed Volatility Fund (LVAMX) and Neiman Large Cap Value Fund (NEIMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LVAMX achieves a 12.32% return, which is significantly lower than NEIMX's 17.29% return. Over the past 10 years, LVAMX has underperformed NEIMX with an annualized return of 7.95%, while NEIMX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.34% annualized return.


LVAMX

1D
0.55%
1M
5.50%
YTD
12.32%
6M
13.26%
1Y
21.46%
3Y*
11.74%
5Y*
6.85%
10Y*
7.95%

NEIMX

1D
1.26%
1M
4.85%
YTD
17.29%
6M
17.10%
1Y
34.32%
3Y*
19.56%
5Y*
12.08%
10Y*
10.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LVAMX vs. NEIMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LVAMX
LSV U.S. Managed Volatility Fund
12.32%15.33%2.07%4.16%-2.66%20.97%-6.86%22.91%-2.17%13.52%
NEIMX
Neiman Large Cap Value Fund
17.29%18.68%13.50%6.15%-5.16%23.85%-5.97%23.49%-9.76%19.00%

Correlation

The correlation between LVAMX and NEIMX is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2014

0.85

Over the past year, the correlation between LVAMX and NEIMX has dropped to 0.62 - well below their long-term average of 0.85, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LVAMX vs. NEIMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LVAMX
LVAMX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
LVAMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LVAMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
LVAMX Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
LVAMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
LVAMX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

NEIMX
NEIMX Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
NEIMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NEIMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
NEIMX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
NEIMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
NEIMX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LVAMX vs. NEIMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LSV U.S. Managed Volatility Fund (LVAMX) and Neiman Large Cap Value Fund (NEIMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LVAMXNEIMXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.24

3.45

-1.20

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.24

4.78

-1.54

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.63

-0.23

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.27

6.10

-1.83

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.66

25.48

-9.81

LVAMX vs. NEIMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LVAMX Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is lower than the NEIMX Sharpe Ratio of 3.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LVAMX and NEIMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LVAMXNEIMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.24

3.45

-1.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

0.02

+0.41

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

0.03

+0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.03

+0.48

Drawdowns

LVAMX vs. NEIMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LVAMX drawdown since its inception was -33.38%, smaller than the maximum NEIMX drawdown of -92.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LVAMX and NEIMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LVAMXNEIMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.38%

-92.94%

+59.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.13%

-5.75%

+0.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.84%

-92.94%

+72.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.84%

-92.94%

+72.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.38%

-92.94%

+59.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-88.99%

+88.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.78%

-10.51%

+5.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.39%

1.37%

+0.02%

Volatility

LVAMX vs. NEIMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for LSV U.S. Managed Volatility Fund (LVAMX) is 2.50%, while Neiman Large Cap Value Fund (NEIMX) has a volatility of 2.72%. This indicates that LVAMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NEIMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LVAMXNEIMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.50%

2.72%

-0.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.88%

7.81%

-0.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.76%

10.18%

-0.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.84%

576.30%

-560.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.13%

407.70%

-391.57%

LVAMX vs. NEIMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LVAMX has a 0.94% expense ratio, which is lower than NEIMX's 1.46% expense ratio.


Dividends

LVAMX vs. NEIMX - Dividend Comparison

LVAMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.83%, more than NEIMX's 0.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LVAMX
LSV U.S. Managed Volatility Fund
18.83%21.15%3.30%17.00%10.71%6.62%3.15%9.37%6.98%3.79%1.98%2.22%
NEIMX
Neiman Large Cap Value Fund
0.65%0.76%1.10%1.36%3.60%17.65%1.20%2.26%1.20%6.64%10.20%4.19%

Frequently Asked Questions


LVAMX and NEIMX have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NEIMX has higher volatility (2.72%) compared to LVAMX (2.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LVAMX dropped -33.38% vs NEIMX's -92.94%.

NEIMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.45 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LVAMX and NEIMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer