LUNR vs. LAES
LUNR (Intuitive Machines Inc. ) and LAES (SEALSQ Corp) are both stocks. LUNR operates in Aerospace & Defense (Industrials), while LAES operates in Semiconductors (Technology). Over the past 3 years, LUNR returned 42.24%/yr vs -33.31%/yr for LAES. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LUNR vs. LAES - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LUNR achieves a 64.02% return, which is significantly higher than LAES's -17.99% return.
LUNR
- 1D
- -13.12%
- 1M
- -25.39%
- YTD
- 64.02%
- 6M
- 122.39%
- 1Y
- 144.44%
- 3Y*
- 42.24%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LAES
- 1D
- -3.13%
- 1M
- 4.73%
- YTD
- -17.99%
- 6M
- -26.89%
- 1Y
- -27.06%
- 3Y*
- -33.31%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LUNR vs. LAES - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
LUNR Intuitive Machines Inc. | 64.02% | -10.63% | 610.76% | -65.05% |
LAES SEALSQ Corp | -17.99% | -38.54% | 380.47% | -92.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between LUNR and LAES is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 24, 2023 | 0.32 |
Over the past year, LUNR and LAES have become more correlated (0.53) than their long-term average of 0.32, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
LUNR:
-$0.00
LAES:
-$0.43
LUNR:
2.95K
LAES:
10.21
LUNR:
$334.27M
LAES:
$35.37M
LUNR:
$85.92M
LAES:
$13.21M
LUNR:
-$96.76M
LAES:
-$41.81M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LUNR vs. LAES — Risk / Return Rank
LUNR
LAES
LUNR vs. LAES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Intuitive Machines Inc. (LUNR) and SEALSQ Corp (LAES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LUNR | LAES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.04 | +0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.47 | -0.37 | +3.84 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.12 | -0.62 | +7.74 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LUNR vs. LAES - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LUNR drawdown since its inception was -97.43%, roughly equal to the maximum LAES drawdown of -98.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LUNR and LAES.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LUNR | LAES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.43% | -98.44% | +1.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -41.94% | -72.68% | +30.74% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -78.54% | -98.07% | +19.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -67.53% | -85.89% | +18.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -63.21% | -84.60% | +21.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 20.37% | 43.58% | -23.21% |
Volatility
LUNR vs. LAES - Volatility Comparison
Intuitive Machines Inc. (LUNR) has a higher volatility of 42.95% compared to SEALSQ Corp (LAES) at 28.38%. This indicates that LUNR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LAES based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LUNR | LAES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 42.95% | 28.38% | +14.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 93.42% | 66.23% | +27.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 111.16% | 109.13% | +2.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 171.29% | 170.29% | +1.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 171.29% | 170.29% | +1.00% |
Dividends
LUNR vs. LAES - Dividend Comparison
Neither LUNR nor LAES has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
LUNR vs. LAES - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Intuitive Machines Inc. and SEALSQ Corp. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
LUNR and LAES have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LUNR has higher volatility (42.95%) compared to LAES (28.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LUNR dropped -97.43% vs LAES's -98.44%.
LUNR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.31 vs -0.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LUNR and LAES
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer