LUNL vs. GRAG
LUNL (Defiance Daily Target 2X Long LUNR ETF) and GRAG (Leverage Shares 2X Long GRAB Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. LUNL is passively managed, while GRAG is actively managed. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LUNL charges 1.31%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for GRAG.
Performance
LUNL vs. GRAG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
LUNL
- 1D
- -8.77%
- 1M
- -75.76%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GRAG
- 1D
- -1.99%
- 1M
- -4.37%
- YTD
- -57.47%
- 6M
- -59.12%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LUNL vs. GRAG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
LUNL Defiance Daily Target 2X Long LUNR ETF | -52.41% |
GRAG Leverage Shares 2X Long GRAB Daily ETF | -55.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between LUNL and GRAG is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2026 | 0.19 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LUNL vs. GRAG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Long LUNR ETF (LUNL) and Leverage Shares 2X Long GRAB Daily ETF (GRAG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LUNL vs. GRAG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LUNL drawdown since its inception was -82.16%, which is greater than GRAG's maximum drawdown of -65.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LUNL and GRAG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LUNL | GRAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.16% | -65.33% | -16.83% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -82.16% | -61.68% | -20.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -36.44% | -41.61% | +5.17% |
Volatility
LUNL vs. GRAG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LUNL | GRAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 258.93% | 69.97% | +188.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 258.93% | 69.97% | +188.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 258.93% | 69.97% | +188.96% |
LUNL vs. GRAG - Expense Ratio Comparison
LUNL has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than GRAG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
LUNL vs. GRAG - Dividend Comparison
Neither LUNL nor GRAG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
LUNL and GRAG have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GRAG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GRAG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for LUNL.
LUNL and GRAG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.31% for LUNL and 0.75% for GRAG.
Find the right allocation for LUNL and GRAG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer