LULU vs. UPST
LULU (Lululemon Athletica Inc.) and UPST (Upstart Holdings, Inc.) are both stocks. LULU operates in Apparel Retail (Consumer Cyclical), while UPST operates in Credit Services (Financial Services). Over the past 5 years, LULU returned -18.89%/yr vs -24.64%/yr for UPST. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LULU vs. UPST - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LULU achieves a -42.85% return, which is significantly lower than UPST's -30.25% return.
LULU
- 1D
- -2.52%
- 1M
- -2.01%
- YTD
- -42.85%
- 6M
- -42.05%
- 1Y
- -51.92%
- 3Y*
- -31.43%
- 5Y*
- -18.89%
- 10Y*
- 5.37%
UPST
- 1D
- -4.06%
- 1M
- 13.00%
- YTD
- -30.25%
- 6M
- -38.20%
- 1Y
- -44.12%
- 3Y*
- -6.21%
- 5Y*
- -24.64%
- 10Y*
- —
LULU vs. UPST - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LULU Lululemon Athletica Inc. | -42.85% | -45.66% | -25.21% | 59.59% | -18.16% | 12.48% | -2.26% |
UPST Upstart Holdings, Inc. | -30.25% | -28.98% | 50.69% | 209.08% | -91.26% | 271.29% | 56.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between LULU and UPST is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2020 | 0.38 |
Fundamentals
LULU:
$13.72B
UPST:
$2.96B
LULU:
$12.35
UPST:
$0.47
LULU:
9.62
UPST:
65.09
LULU:
0.47
UPST:
0.28
LULU:
1.25
UPST:
2.76
LULU:
2.73
UPST:
4.03
LULU:
$11.20B
UPST:
$1.16B
LULU:
$6.24B
UPST:
$810.61M
LULU:
$2.44B
UPST:
$67.66M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LULU vs. UPST — Risk / Return Rank
LULU
UPST
LULU vs. UPST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU) and Upstart Holdings, Inc. (UPST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LULU | UPST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.78 | 0.93 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.97 | -0.62 | -0.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.72 | -0.92 | -0.79 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LULU vs. UPST - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LULU drawdown since its inception was -92.26%, roughly equal to the maximum UPST drawdown of -96.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LULU and UPST.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LULU | UPST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.26% | -96.90% | +4.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -53.88% | -71.21% | +17.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -77.66% | -72.72% | -4.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -77.66% | -96.90% | +19.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -77.66% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -76.77% | -92.18% | +15.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.61% | -76.18% | +48.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 30.26% | 47.83% | -17.57% |
Volatility
LULU vs. UPST - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU) is 13.47%, while Upstart Holdings, Inc. (UPST) has a volatility of 21.77%. This indicates that LULU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UPST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LULU | UPST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.47% | 21.77% | -8.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.76% | 50.33% | -17.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.48% | 71.10% | -26.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.22% | 103.59% | -61.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.62% | 113.97% | -73.35% |
Dividends
LULU vs. UPST - Dividend Comparison
Neither LULU nor UPST has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
LULU vs. UPST - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lululemon Athletica Inc. and Upstart Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LULU vs. UPST - Profitability Comparison
LULU - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lululemon Athletica Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.34B and revenue of 2.47B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 54.2%.
UPST - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Upstart Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 308.21M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
LULU - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lululemon Athletica Inc. reported an operating income of 276.95M and revenue of 2.47B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.2%.
UPST - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Upstart Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of -7.52M and revenue of 308.21M, resulting in an operating margin of -2.4%.
LULU - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lululemon Athletica Inc. reported a net income of 195.05M and revenue of 2.47B, resulting in a net margin of 7.9%.
UPST - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Upstart Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of -6.65M and revenue of 308.21M, resulting in a net margin of -2.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
LULU and UPST have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UPST has higher volatility (21.77%) compared to LULU (13.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LULU dropped -92.26% vs UPST's -96.90%.
UPST currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.62 vs -1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LULU and UPST
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer