LULG vs. RBLU
LULG (Leverage Shares 2X Long LULU Daily ETF) and RBLU (T-Rex 2X Long RBLX Daily Target ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. LULG is actively managed, while RBLU is passively managed. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LULG charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for RBLU.
Performance
LULG vs. RBLU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LULG achieves a -68.58% return, which is significantly higher than RBLU's -79.38% return.
LULG
- 1D
- -1.59%
- 1M
- -10.00%
- YTD
- -68.58%
- 6M
- -60.69%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RBLU
- 1D
- -1.39%
- 1M
- -7.82%
- YTD
- -79.38%
- 6M
- -85.52%
- 1Y
- -87.47%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LULG vs. RBLU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LULG Leverage Shares 2X Long LULU Daily ETF | -68.58% | 47.31% |
RBLU T-Rex 2X Long RBLX Daily Target ETF | -79.38% | -40.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between LULG and RBLU is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2025 | 0.28 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LULG vs. RBLU — Risk / Return Rank
LULG
RBLU
LULG vs. RBLU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long LULU Daily ETF (LULG) and T-Rex 2X Long RBLX Daily Target ETF (RBLU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LULG | RBLU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | -0.73 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.87 | -0.58 | -0.29 |
Drawdowns
LULG vs. RBLU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LULG drawdown since its inception was -73.18%, smaller than the maximum RBLU drawdown of -94.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LULG and RBLU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LULG | RBLU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.18% | -94.59% | +21.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -94.59% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -70.90% | -94.24% | +23.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -33.71% | -43.04% | +9.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 61.97% | — |
Volatility
LULG vs. RBLU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LULG | RBLU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 34.21% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 98.98% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 85.42% | 119.35% | -33.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 85.42% | 117.02% | -31.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 85.42% | 117.02% | -31.60% |
LULG vs. RBLU - Expense Ratio Comparison
LULG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than RBLU's 1.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
LULG vs. RBLU - Dividend Comparison
LULG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RBLU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.28%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
LULG Leverage Shares 2X Long LULU Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RBLU T-Rex 2X Long RBLX Daily Target ETF | 6.28% | 1.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LULG and RBLU have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LULG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LULG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for RBLU.
RBLU has the higher dividend yield at 6.28%, compared with 0.00% for LULG.
They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and T-Rex. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for LULG and 1.05% for RBLU.
Find the right allocation for LULG and RBLU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer