PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LULG vs. QCMU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LULG vs. QCMU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long LULU Daily ETF (LULG) and Direxion Daily QCOM Bull 2X Shares (QCMU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LULG achieves a -78.27% return, which is significantly lower than QCMU's 35.64% return.


LULG

1D
-11.57%
1M
-33.75%
YTD
-78.27%
6M
-79.36%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QCMU

1D
-3.68%
1M
-17.77%
YTD
35.64%
6M
30.44%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LULG vs. QCMU - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between LULG and QCMU is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2025

0.31

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LULG vs. QCMU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long LULU Daily ETF (LULG) and Direxion Daily QCOM Bull 2X Shares (QCMU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

LULG vs. QCMU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LULG vs. QCMU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LULG drawdown since its inception was -79.88%, which is greater than QCMU's maximum drawdown of -59.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LULG and QCMU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LULGQCMUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-79.88%

-59.48%

-20.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-79.88%

-25.56%

-54.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-36.43%

-22.82%

-13.61%

Volatility

LULG vs. QCMU - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LULGQCMUDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

88.07%

100.77%

-12.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

88.07%

100.77%

-12.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

88.07%

100.77%

-12.70%

LULG vs. QCMU - Expense Ratio Comparison

LULG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than QCMU's 1.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

LULG vs. QCMU - Dividend Comparison

LULG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QCMU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%.


Frequently Asked Questions


LULG and QCMU have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LULG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LULG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for QCMU.

QCMU has the higher dividend yield at 1.51%, compared with 0.00% for LULG.

They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for LULG and 1.07% for QCMU.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LULG and QCMU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer