LULG vs. GLGG
LULG (Leverage Shares 2X Long LULU Daily ETF) and GLGG (Leverage Shares 2X Long GLXY Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Leverage Shares. Both are actively managed. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LULG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.76%/yr for GLGG.
Performance
LULG vs. GLGG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LULG achieves a -78.27% return, which is significantly lower than GLGG's 27.01% return.
LULG
- 1D
- -11.57%
- 1M
- -33.75%
- YTD
- -78.27%
- 6M
- -79.36%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GLGG
- 1D
- -6.46%
- 1M
- 21.20%
- YTD
- 27.01%
- 6M
- 3.60%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LULG vs. GLGG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LULG Leverage Shares 2X Long LULU Daily ETF | -78.27% | 55.59% |
GLGG Leverage Shares 2X Long GLXY Daily ETF | 27.01% | -55.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between LULG and GLGG is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2025 | 0.22 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LULG vs. GLGG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long LULU Daily ETF (LULG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long GLXY Daily ETF (GLGG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LULG vs. GLGG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LULG drawdown since its inception was -79.88%, smaller than the maximum GLGG drawdown of -90.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LULG and GLGG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LULG | GLGG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.88% | -90.66% | +10.78% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -79.88% | -71.77% | -8.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -36.43% | -58.47% | +22.04% |
Volatility
LULG vs. GLGG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LULG | GLGG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 88.07% | 181.76% | -93.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 88.07% | 181.76% | -93.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 88.07% | 181.76% | -93.69% |
LULG vs. GLGG - Expense Ratio Comparison
LULG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than GLGG's 0.76% expense ratio.
Dividends
LULG vs. GLGG - Dividend Comparison
Neither LULG nor GLGG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
LULG and GLGG have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LULG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LULG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.76% for GLGG.
LULG and GLGG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
Their fees differ too: 0.75% for LULG and 0.76% for GLGG.
Find the right allocation for LULG and GLGG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer