GLGG vs. KORU
GLGG (Leverage Shares 2X Long GLXY Daily ETF) and KORU (Direxion Daily MSCI South Korea Bull 3X Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - GLGG is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Leverage Shares, while KORU is a South Korea Equities fund tracking the MSCI Korea 25/50 Index. GLGG is actively managed, while KORU is passively managed. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GLGG charges 0.76%/yr vs 1.32%/yr for KORU.
Performance
GLGG vs. KORU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLGG achieves a -32.77% return, which is significantly lower than KORU's 140.92% return.
GLGG
- 1D
- 3.02%
- 1M
- -49.14%
- 6M
- -56.54%
- YTD
- -32.77%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KORU
- 1D
- -9.13%
- 1M
- -56.23%
- 6M
- 71.42%
- YTD
- 140.92%
- 1Y
- 424.43%
- 3Y*
- 62.59%
- 5Y*
- 3.05%
- 10Y*
- 6.77%
GLGG vs. KORU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GLGG Leverage Shares 2X Long GLXY Daily ETF | -32.77% | -37.41% |
KORU Direxion Daily MSCI South Korea Bull 3X Shares | 140.92% | 138.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLGG and KORU is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2025 | 0.46 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLGG vs. KORU — Risk / Return Rank
GLGG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
KORU
GLGG vs. KORU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long GLXY Daily ETF (GLGG) and Direxion Daily MSCI South Korea Bull 3X Shares (KORU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GLGG | KORU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.40 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 6.40 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 17.42 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GLGG vs. KORU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLGG drawdown since its inception was -90.66%, smaller than the maximum KORU drawdown of -95.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLGG and KORU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLGG | KORU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.66% | -95.79% | +5.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -66.86% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -73.34% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -92.74% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -95.79% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -85.06% | -65.42% | -19.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -60.17% | -57.39% | -2.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 24.52% | — |
Volatility
GLGG vs. KORU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GLGG | KORU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 73.41% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 146.69% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 178.78% | 150.79% | +27.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 178.78% | 93.81% | +84.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 178.78% | 84.24% | +94.54% |
GLGG vs. KORU - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLGG has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is lower than KORU's 1.32% expense ratio.
Dividends
GLGG vs. KORU - Dividend Comparison
GLGG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KORU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLGG Leverage Shares 2X Long GLXY Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
KORU Direxion Daily MSCI South Korea Bull 3X Shares | 0.36% | 0.89% | 4.10% | 2.55% | 0.48% | 0.76% | 0.01% | 0.93% | 1.40% | 3.59% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GLGG and KORU have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GLGG is cheaper at 0.76% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GLGG is cheaper with a 0.76% expense ratio, compared with 1.32% for KORU.
KORU has the higher dividend yield at 0.36%, compared with 0.00% for GLGG.
GLGG is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while KORU is South Korea Equities. They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.76% for GLGG and 1.32% for KORU.
Find the right allocation for GLGG and KORU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer