LUG.TO vs. PSIX

Last updated Jul 25, 2026

LUG.TO (Lundin Gold Inc.) and PSIX (Power Solutions International, Inc.) are both stocks. LUG.TO operates in Gold (Basic Materials), while PSIX operates in Specialty Industrial Machinery (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, LUG.TO returned 33.87%/yr vs 6.33%/yr for PSIX. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

LUG.TO vs. PSIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Lundin Gold Inc. (LUG.TO) and Power Solutions International, Inc. (PSIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

LUG.TO is traded in CAD, while PSIX is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the PSIX values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LUG.TO achieves a -23.93% return, which is significantly higher than PSIX's -46.05% return. Over the past 10 years, LUG.TO has outperformed PSIX with an annualized return of 33.87%, while PSIX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.33% annualized return.

LUG.TO

• 1D: 0.46%
• 1M: 6.19%
• 6M: -28.27%
• YTD: -23.93%
• 1Y: 38.99%
• 3Y*: 72.82%
• 5Y*: 57.97%
• 10Y*: 33.87%
• ALL TIME*: 9.02%

PSIX

• 1D: -4.48%
• 1M: -22.71%
• 6M: -60.35%
• YTD: -46.05%
• 1Y: -65.33%
• 3Y*: 122.74%
• 5Y*: 35.34%
• 10Y*: 6.33%
• ALL TIME*: 6.59%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
LUG.TO Lundin Gold Inc.	CA$38.15M	CA$40.02M	CA$56.19M
PSIX Power Solutions International, Inc.	CA$19.50M	CA$20.05M	CA$42.74M

LUG.TO vs. PSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LUG.TO Lundin Gold Inc.	-23.93%	291.22%	91.60%	29.55%	30.60%	-4.67%	31.21%	66.93%	10.15%	-13.88%
PSIX Power Solutions International, Inc.	-46.05%	83.30%	1,474.10%	-33.29%	6.34%	-9.14%	-59.22%	-18.11%	33.70%	-6.77%

Correlation

The correlation between LUG.TO and PSIX is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.25
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.10
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.07
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.06
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 17, 2012	0.05

The correlation between LUG.TO and PSIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.05 (all time) to 0.25 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap LUG.TO : CA$19.20B PSIX : $690.59M
EPS LUG.TO : $3.76 PSIX : $4.43
PE Ratio LUG.TO : 15.00 PSIX : 6.76
PEG Ratio LUG.TO : 0.20 PSIX : 0.07
PS Ratio LUG.TO : 6.86 PSIX : 1.18
PB Ratio LUG.TO : 10.05 PSIX : 3.72
Total Revenue (TTM) LUG.TO : $2.00B PSIX : $586.96M
Gross Profit (TTM) LUG.TO : $1.41B PSIX : $172.81M
EBITDA (TTM) LUG.TO : $1.43B PSIX : $102.78M

Return for Risk

LUG.TO vs. PSIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LUG.TO

LUG.TO Risk / Return Rank: 68
LUG.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
LUG.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
LUG.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 65
LUG.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
LUG.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 68

PSIX

PSIX Risk / Return Rank: 14
PSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
PSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
PSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 19
PSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
PSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LUG.TO vs. PSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lundin Gold Inc. (LUG.TO) and Power Solutions International, Inc. (PSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LUG.TO	PSIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.70	-0.66	+1.36
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.22	-0.71	+1.93
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	0.91	+0.24
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.03	-0.89	+1.92
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.19	-1.50	+3.69

LUG.TO vs. PSIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LUG.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.70, which is higher than the PSIX Sharpe Ratio of -0.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LUG.TO and PSIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LUG.TO vs. PSIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LUG.TO drawdown since its inception was -94.74%, roughly equal to the maximum PSIX drawdown of -98.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LUG.TO and PSIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LUG.TO	PSIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-94.74%	-98.29%	+3.55%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-37.88%	-73.81%	+35.93%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-37.88%	-73.81%	+35.93%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.88%	-83.94%	+46.06%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-41.84%	-93.08%	+51.24%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-32.54%	-73.62%	+41.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-67.68%	-66.10%	-1.58%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	17.87%	43.46%	-25.59%

Volatility

LUG.TO vs. PSIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lundin Gold Inc. (LUG.TO) is 12.47%, while Power Solutions International, Inc. (PSIX) has a volatility of 18.49%. This indicates that LUG.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LUG.TO	PSIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.47%	18.49%	-6.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	43.59%	88.63%	-45.04%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	56.18%	99.29%	-43.11%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	46.49%	112.86%	-66.37%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	43.56%	106.01%	-62.45%

Dividends

LUG.TO vs. PSIX - Dividend Comparison

LUG.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.58%, while PSIX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
LUG.TO Lundin Gold Inc.	6.58%	3.35%	2.69%	3.26%	1.97%
PSIX Power Solutions International, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LUG.TO and PSIX in my portfolio?

LUG.TO and PSIX have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.