LUG.TO vs. GILD
LUG.TO (Lundin Gold Inc.) and GILD (Gilead Sciences, Inc.) are both stocks. LUG.TO operates in Gold (Basic Materials), while GILD operates in Drug Manufacturers - General (Healthcare). Over the past 10 years, LUG.TO returned 32.96%/yr vs 8.99%/yr for GILD. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LUG.TO vs. GILD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
LUG.TO is traded in CAD, while GILD is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the GILD values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LUG.TO achieves a -26.55% return, which is significantly lower than GILD's 6.87% return. Over the past 10 years, LUG.TO has outperformed GILD with an annualized return of 32.96%, while GILD has yielded a comparatively lower 8.99% annualized return.
LUG.TO
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- -13.90%
- YTD
- -26.55%
- 6M
- -23.60%
- 1Y
- 20.17%
- 3Y*
- 78.91%
- 5Y*
- 53.88%
- 10Y*
- 32.96%
GILD
- 1D
- -0.55%
- 1M
- -0.43%
- YTD
- 6.87%
- 6M
- 7.85%
- 1Y
- 19.31%
- 3Y*
- 23.74%
- 5Y*
- 20.95%
- 10Y*
- 8.99%
LUG.TO vs. GILD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LUG.TO Lundin Gold Inc. | -26.55% | 291.22% | 91.60% | 29.55% | 30.60% | -4.67% | 31.21% | 66.93% | 10.15% | -13.88% |
GILD Gilead Sciences, Inc. | 6.87% | 30.36% | 28.73% | -4.32% | 31.46% | 29.89% | -8.91% | 3.43% | -2.35% | -4.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between LUG.TO and GILD is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 6, 2006 | 0.01 |
Fundamentals
LUG.TO:
CA$19.02B
GILD:
$160.64B
LUG.TO:
CA$3.77
GILD:
$7.35
LUG.TO:
20.77
GILD:
17.43
LUG.TO:
0.28
GILD:
0.04
LUG.TO:
9.50
GILD:
5.40
LUG.TO:
13.96
GILD:
6.83
LUG.TO:
CA$2.00B
GILD:
$29.74B
LUG.TO:
CA$1.41B
GILD:
$18.74B
LUG.TO:
CA$1.43B
GILD:
$12.88B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LUG.TO vs. GILD — Risk / Return Rank
LUG.TO
GILD
LUG.TO vs. GILD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lundin Gold Inc. (LUG.TO) and Gilead Sciences, Inc. (GILD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LUG.TO | GILD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.14 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.58 | 1.14 | -0.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.50 | 2.83 | -1.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LUG.TO | GILD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 | 0.73 | -0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.17 | 0.84 | +0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.76 | 0.34 | +0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.12 | 0.51 | -0.38 |
Drawdowns
LUG.TO vs. GILD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LUG.TO drawdown since its inception was -94.74%, which is greater than GILD's maximum drawdown of -48.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LUG.TO and GILD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LUG.TO | GILD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.74% | -48.16% | -46.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.14% | -17.02% | -18.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.14% | -25.87% | -9.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.94% | -25.87% | -13.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.84% | -36.49% | -5.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -34.86% | -15.15% | -19.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -67.65% | -19.05% | -48.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.50% | 6.84% | +6.66% |
Volatility
LUG.TO vs. GILD - Volatility Comparison
Lundin Gold Inc. (LUG.TO) has a higher volatility of 17.75% compared to Gilead Sciences, Inc. (GILD) at 6.81%. This indicates that LUG.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GILD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LUG.TO | GILD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.75% | 6.81% | +10.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 41.85% | 18.57% | +23.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 56.10% | 26.50% | +29.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 46.53% | 25.06% | +21.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 43.39% | 26.32% | +17.07% |
Dividends
LUG.TO vs. GILD - Dividend Comparison
LUG.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.30%, more than GILD's 2.49% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GILD Gilead Sciences, Inc. | 2.49% | 2.57% | 3.33% | 3.70% | 3.40% | 3.91% | 4.67% | 3.88% | 3.65% | 2.90% | 2.57% | 1.27% |
LUG.TO Lundin Gold Inc. | 5.30% | 3.35% | 2.69% | 3.26% | 1.97% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
LUG.TO vs. GILD - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lundin Gold Inc. and Gilead Sciences, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LUG.TO vs. GILD - Profitability Comparison
LUG.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lundin Gold Inc. reported a gross profit of 420.70M and revenue of 567.38M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.2%.
GILD - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gilead Sciences, Inc. reported a gross profit of 79.20M and revenue of 6.96B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 1.1%.
LUG.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lundin Gold Inc. reported an operating income of 391.03M and revenue of 567.38M, resulting in an operating margin of 68.9%.
GILD - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gilead Sciences, Inc. reported an operating income of 2.59B and revenue of 6.96B, resulting in an operating margin of 37.2%.
LUG.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lundin Gold Inc. reported a net income of 273.33M and revenue of 567.38M, resulting in a net margin of 48.2%.
GILD - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gilead Sciences, Inc. reported a net income of 2.02B and revenue of 6.96B, resulting in a net margin of 29.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
LUG.TO and GILD have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for LUG.TO and GILD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer