LUBIX vs. MIFIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Thrivent Income Fund (LUBIX) and Miller Intermediate Bond Fund (MIFIX).
LUBIX is managed by Thrivent. It was launched on Jun 1, 1972. MIFIX is managed by Miller Investment. It was launched on Dec 31, 2014.
Performance
LUBIX vs. MIFIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
LUBIX vs. MIFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LUBIX Thrivent Income Fund | -1.25% | 7.57% | 2.93% | 8.11% | -16.07% | -0.76% | 11.61% | 13.20% | -2.60% | 5.69% |
MIFIX Miller Intermediate Bond Fund | -0.64% | 7.11% | 7.31% | 6.88% | -7.72% | 4.32% | 14.22% | 9.79% | -1.91% | 3.10% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LUBIX achieves a -1.25% return, which is significantly lower than MIFIX's -0.64% return. Over the past 10 years, LUBIX has underperformed MIFIX with an annualized return of 2.76%, while MIFIX has yielded a comparatively higher 4.90% annualized return.
LUBIX
- 1D
- 0.55%
- 1M
- -2.68%
- YTD
- -1.25%
- 6M
- -0.47%
- 1Y
- 3.83%
- 3Y*
- 4.45%
- 5Y*
- 0.50%
- 10Y*
- 2.76%
MIFIX
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- -1.99%
- YTD
- -0.64%
- 6M
- 1.05%
- 1Y
- 5.25%
- 3Y*
- 6.36%
- 5Y*
- 2.80%
- 10Y*
- 4.90%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LUBIX vs. MIFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LUBIX has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than MIFIX's 0.99% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
LUBIX vs. MIFIX — Risk / Return Rank
LUBIX
MIFIX
LUBIX vs. MIFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thrivent Income Fund (LUBIX) and Miller Intermediate Bond Fund (MIFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LUBIX | MIFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.95 | 1.60 | -0.65 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.35 | 2.36 | -1.01 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.30 | -0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.51 | 1.84 | -0.33 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.99 | 6.91 | -1.92 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LUBIX | MIFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 | 1.60 | -0.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 | 0.55 | -0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 | 0.91 | -0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 0.90 | -0.25 |
Correlation
The correlation between LUBIX and MIFIX is 0.17, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
LUBIX vs. MIFIX - Dividend Comparison
LUBIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.93%, less than MIFIX's 4.20% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LUBIX Thrivent Income Fund | 3.93% | 4.20% | 4.13% | 3.06% | 3.30% | 4.18% | 5.21% | 3.42% | 3.44% | 2.99% | 3.16% | 3.40% |
MIFIX Miller Intermediate Bond Fund | 4.20% | 4.59% | 4.08% | 3.60% | 3.62% | 5.87% | 5.16% | 2.36% | 5.16% | 3.90% | 1.48% | 1.78% |
Drawdowns
LUBIX vs. MIFIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LUBIX drawdown since its inception was -23.52%, which is greater than MIFIX's maximum drawdown of -15.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LUBIX and MIFIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| LUBIX | MIFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.52% | -15.58% | -7.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.22% | -2.68% | -0.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.12% | -11.87% | -10.25% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.12% | -15.58% | -6.54% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.68% | -2.68% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.80% | -2.08% | -1.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.97% | 0.71% | +0.26% |
Volatility
LUBIX vs. MIFIX - Volatility Comparison
Thrivent Income Fund (LUBIX) has a higher volatility of 1.78% compared to Miller Intermediate Bond Fund (MIFIX) at 0.76%. This indicates that LUBIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MIFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| LUBIX | MIFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.78% | 0.76% | +1.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.78% | 2.06% | +0.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.59% | 3.22% | +1.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.38% | 5.09% | +1.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.61% | 5.40% | +0.21% |