PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MIFIX vs. CBFSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MIFIX vs. CBFSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Miller Intermediate Bond Fund (MIFIX) and JPMorgan Corporate Bond Fund (CBFSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MIFIX achieves a 5.78% return, which is significantly higher than CBFSX's -1.58% return. Over the past 10 years, MIFIX has outperformed CBFSX with an annualized return of 4.94%, while CBFSX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.44% annualized return.


MIFIX

1D
-0.23%
1M
0.06%
6M
4.54%
YTD
5.78%
1Y
9.96%
3Y*
7.15%
5Y*
3.99%
10Y*
4.94%
ALL TIME*
5.15%

CBFSX

1D
0.12%
1M
-1.62%
6M
-1.94%
YTD
-1.58%
1Y
1.06%
3Y*
4.48%
5Y*
-0.28%
10Y*
2.44%
ALL TIME*
2.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

MIFIX vs. CBFSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MIFIX
Miller Intermediate Bond Fund
5.78%7.11%7.31%6.88%-7.72%4.32%14.22%9.79%-1.91%3.10%
CBFSX
JPMorgan Corporate Bond Fund
-1.58%7.45%2.71%9.20%-16.06%-0.77%10.23%15.05%-2.31%6.89%

Correlation

The correlation between MIFIX and CBFSX is 0.46, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.35

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.29

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2015

0.16

Over the past year, MIFIX and CBFSX have become more correlated (0.46) than their long-term average of 0.16, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MIFIX vs. CBFSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MIFIX
MIFIX Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
MIFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MIFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
MIFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
MIFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
MIFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

CBFSX
CBFSX Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
CBFSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBFSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBFSX Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
CBFSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBFSX Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MIFIX vs. CBFSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Miller Intermediate Bond Fund (MIFIX) and JPMorgan Corporate Bond Fund (CBFSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MIFIXCBFSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.64

1.07

+0.57

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.63

0.51

+3.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.32

1.21

+13.11

MIFIX vs. CBFSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MIFIX Sharpe Ratio is 3.14, which is higher than the CBFSX Sharpe Ratio of 0.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MIFIX and CBFSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MIFIX vs. CBFSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MIFIX drawdown since its inception was -15.58%, smaller than the maximum CBFSX drawdown of -22.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MIFIX and CBFSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MIFIXCBFSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.58%

-22.42%

+6.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.68%

-3.49%

+0.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.10%

-5.41%

+0.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.87%

-22.42%

+10.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.58%

-22.42%

+6.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.35%

-3.33%

+2.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.03%

-4.33%

+2.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.68%

1.47%

-0.79%

Volatility

MIFIX vs. CBFSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Miller Intermediate Bond Fund (MIFIX) is 0.78%, while JPMorgan Corporate Bond Fund (CBFSX) has a volatility of 1.17%. This indicates that MIFIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CBFSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MIFIXCBFSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.78%

1.17%

-0.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.32%

3.29%

-0.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.10%

4.21%

-1.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.93%

6.64%

-1.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.40%

6.01%

-0.61%

MIFIX vs. CBFSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MIFIX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than CBFSX's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

MIFIX vs. CBFSX - Dividend Comparison

MIFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.36%, more than CBFSX's 4.20% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CBFSX
JPMorgan Corporate Bond Fund
4.20%4.54%4.99%4.18%4.06%7.96%3.74%3.14%4.55%6.78%3.11%3.11%
MIFIX
Miller Intermediate Bond Fund
4.36%4.59%4.08%3.60%3.62%5.87%5.16%2.36%5.16%3.90%1.48%1.78%

Frequently Asked Questions


MIFIX and CBFSX have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CBFSX has higher volatility (1.17%) compared to MIFIX (0.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MIFIX dropped -15.58% vs CBFSX's -22.42%.

MIFIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.14 vs 0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MIFIX and CBFSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer