PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LTTI vs. GOOW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LTTI vs. GOOW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest 20+ Year Treasury & Target Income ETF (LTTI) and Roundhill GOOGL WeeklyPay™ ETF (GOOW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LTTI achieves a -1.05% return, which is significantly lower than GOOW's 15.42% return.


LTTI

1D
-0.18%
1M
0.28%
YTD
-1.05%
6M
-2.14%
1Y
4.48%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GOOW

1D
-0.89%
1M
-7.95%
YTD
15.42%
6M
11.81%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LTTI vs. GOOW - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between LTTI and GOOW is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2025

0.14

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LTTI vs. GOOW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LTTI
LTTI Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
LTTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LTTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
LTTI Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
LTTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
LTTI Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

GOOW
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LTTI vs. GOOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest 20+ Year Treasury & Target Income ETF (LTTI) and Roundhill GOOGL WeeklyPay™ ETF (GOOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LTTIGOOWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.57

LTTI vs. GOOW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LTTIGOOWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.09

3.43

-3.34

Drawdowns

LTTI vs. GOOW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LTTI drawdown since its inception was -9.02%, smaller than the maximum GOOW drawdown of -24.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LTTI and GOOW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LTTIGOOWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.02%

-24.88%

+15.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.69%

-13.20%

+8.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.65%

-4.80%

+1.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.86%

Volatility

LTTI vs. GOOW - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LTTIGOOWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.92%

37.38%

-28.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.28%

37.38%

-27.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.28%

37.38%

-27.10%

LTTI vs. GOOW - Expense Ratio Comparison

LTTI has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than GOOW's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

LTTI vs. GOOW - Dividend Comparison

LTTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.21%, less than GOOW's 35.21% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


LTTI and GOOW have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LTTI is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LTTI is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for GOOW.

GOOW has the higher dividend yield at 35.21%, compared with 9.21% for LTTI.

They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for LTTI and 0.99% for GOOW.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LTTI and GOOW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer