PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LTTI vs. BUCK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LTTI vs. BUCK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest 20+ Year Treasury & Target Income ETF (LTTI) and Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF (BUCK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LTTI achieves a -1.05% return, which is significantly lower than BUCK's 1.90% return.


LTTI

1D
-0.18%
1M
0.28%
YTD
-1.05%
6M
-2.14%
1Y
4.48%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BUCK

1D
0.02%
1M
0.38%
YTD
1.90%
6M
2.09%
1Y
7.95%
3Y*
5.27%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LTTI vs. BUCK - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between LTTI and BUCK is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 14, 2025

0.40

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LTTI vs. BUCK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LTTI
LTTI Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
LTTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LTTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
LTTI Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
LTTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
LTTI Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

BUCK
BUCK Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
BUCK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUCK Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUCK Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
BUCK Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUCK Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LTTI vs. BUCK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest 20+ Year Treasury & Target Income ETF (LTTI) and Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF (BUCK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LTTIBUCKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.54

-0.46

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.64

6.11

-5.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.57

32.31

-30.74

LTTI vs. BUCK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LTTI Sharpe Ratio is 0.50, which is lower than the BUCK Sharpe Ratio of 2.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LTTI and BUCK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LTTIBUCKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

2.54

-2.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.09

1.47

-1.38

Drawdowns

LTTI vs. BUCK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LTTI drawdown since its inception was -9.02%, which is greater than BUCK's maximum drawdown of -5.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LTTI and BUCK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LTTIBUCKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.02%

-5.43%

-3.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.08%

-1.31%

-5.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.69%

-0.04%

-4.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.65%

-0.49%

-3.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.86%

0.25%

+2.61%

Volatility

LTTI vs. BUCK - Volatility Comparison

FT Vest 20+ Year Treasury & Target Income ETF (LTTI) has a higher volatility of 2.56% compared to Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF (BUCK) at 0.70%. This indicates that LTTI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BUCK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LTTIBUCKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.56%

0.70%

+1.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.06%

1.53%

+4.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.92%

3.14%

+5.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.28%

3.49%

+6.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.28%

3.49%

+6.79%

LTTI vs. BUCK - Expense Ratio Comparison

LTTI has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than BUCK's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

LTTI vs. BUCK - Dividend Comparison

LTTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.21%, more than BUCK's 7.42% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
BUCK
Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF
7.42%7.59%8.84%4.84%0.59%
LTTI
FT Vest 20+ Year Treasury & Target Income ETF
9.21%7.08%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


LTTI and BUCK have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LTTI has higher volatility (2.56%) compared to BUCK (0.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LTTI dropped -9.02% vs BUCK's -5.43%.

On 1-year performance, BUCK leads with 7.95% vs 4.48% for LTTI. On fees, BUCK is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, BUCK has been the lower-risk option at 0.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BUCK has performed better with a 7.95% return vs 4.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BUCK is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for LTTI.

LTTI has the higher dividend yield at 9.21%, compared with 7.42% for BUCK.

LTTI is categorized as Derivative Income, while BUCK is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for LTTI and 0.35% for BUCK.

BUCK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LTTI and BUCK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer