LTPZ vs. EMNT
Compare and contrast key facts about PIMCO 15+ Year US TIPS Index ETF (LTPZ) and PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ESG ETF (EMNT).
LTPZ and EMNT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. LTPZ is a passively managed fund by PIMCO that tracks the performance of the ICE BofA US Inflation-Linked Treasury (15+ Y). It was launched on Sep 3, 2009. EMNT is an actively managed fund by PIMCO. It was launched on Dec 10, 2019.
Performance
LTPZ vs. EMNT - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
LTPZ vs. EMNT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LTPZ PIMCO 15+ Year US TIPS Index ETF | -1.39% | 4.00% | -4.80% | 0.96% | -31.71% | 7.02% | 24.89% | -0.70% |
EMNT PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ESG ETF | 0.97% | 4.74% | 5.79% | 5.84% | -0.57% | 0.11% | 2.08% | 0.09% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LTPZ achieves a -1.39% return, which is significantly lower than EMNT's 0.97% return.
LTPZ
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- -4.79%
- YTD
- -1.39%
- 6M
- -2.84%
- 1Y
- -2.68%
- 3Y*
- -2.37%
- 5Y*
- -4.68%
- 10Y*
- 0.59%
EMNT
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 0.24%
- YTD
- 0.97%
- 6M
- 2.04%
- 1Y
- 4.51%
- 3Y*
- 5.31%
- 5Y*
- 3.34%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LTPZ vs. EMNT - Expense Ratio Comparison
LTPZ has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than EMNT's 0.24% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
LTPZ vs. EMNT — Risk / Return Rank
LTPZ
EMNT
LTPZ vs. EMNT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO 15+ Year US TIPS Index ETF (LTPZ) and PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ESG ETF (EMNT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LTPZ | EMNT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.24 | 11.02 | -11.26 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.24 | 23.01 | -23.25 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 5.88 | -4.91 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.21 | 34.06 | -34.27 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.43 | 226.92 | -227.35 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LTPZ | EMNT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.24 | 11.02 | -11.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.30 | 4.08 | -4.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.04 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.21 | 3.45 | -3.24 |
Correlation
The correlation between LTPZ and EMNT is 0.22, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
LTPZ vs. EMNT - Dividend Comparison
LTPZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.64%, more than EMNT's 4.23% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LTPZ PIMCO 15+ Year US TIPS Index ETF | 4.64% | 4.64% | 3.71% | 3.71% | 8.38% | 3.56% | 1.42% | 1.74% | 3.05% | 2.25% | 2.32% | 0.71% |
EMNT PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ESG ETF | 4.23% | 4.46% | 5.14% | 4.62% | 2.79% | 0.66% | 1.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
LTPZ vs. EMNT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LTPZ drawdown since its inception was -40.99%, which is greater than EMNT's maximum drawdown of -2.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LTPZ and EMNT.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| LTPZ | EMNT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.99% | -2.28% | -38.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.82% | -0.13% | -7.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.99% | -1.70% | -39.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.99% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -33.95% | 0.00% | -33.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.19% | -0.24% | -11.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.92% | 0.02% | +3.90% |
Volatility
LTPZ vs. EMNT - Volatility Comparison
PIMCO 15+ Year US TIPS Index ETF (LTPZ) has a higher volatility of 3.99% compared to PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ESG ETF (EMNT) at 0.24%. This indicates that LTPZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMNT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| LTPZ | EMNT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.99% | 0.24% | +3.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.46% | 0.29% | +6.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.28% | 0.41% | +10.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.92% | 0.82% | +15.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.10% | 0.87% | +14.23% |