LTMAY vs. NBIS

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

LTMAY (LATAM Airlines Group S.A.) and NBIS (Nebius Group N.V.) are both stocks. LTMAY operates in Airlines (Industrials), while NBIS operates in Internet Content & Information (Communication Services). At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

LTMAY vs. NBIS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in LATAM Airlines Group S.A. (LTMAY) and Nebius Group N.V. (NBIS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

LTMAY

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NBIS

• 1D: -2.95%
• 1M: 28.16%
• YTD: 228.83%
• 6M: 205.73%
• 1Y: 479.72%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LTMAY vs. NBIS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
LTMAY LATAM Airlines Group S.A.	-99.70%
NBIS Nebius Group N.V.	89.88%

Correlation

The correlation between LTMAY and NBIS is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2026	0.25

Fundamentals

Total Revenue (TTM) LTMAY : $12.52B NBIS : $877.90M
Gross Profit (TTM) LTMAY : $5.38B NBIS : $420.60M
EBITDA (TTM) LTMAY : $5.22B NBIS : -$52.78M

Return for Risk

LTMAY vs. NBIS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LTMAY

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

NBIS

NBIS Risk / Return Rank: 96
NBIS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
NBIS Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
NBIS Omega Ratio Rank: 92
NBIS Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
NBIS Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LTMAY vs. NBIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LATAM Airlines Group S.A. (LTMAY) and Nebius Group N.V. (NBIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LTMAY	NBIS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	4.62	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	4.20	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.47	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	10.64	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	24.32	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	LTMAY	NBIS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-58.27%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-45.47%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-3.99%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-18.69%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	19.85%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	LTMAY	NBIS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	27.11%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	71.03%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	104.65%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	109.87%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	109.87%	—

Dividends

LTMAY vs. NBIS - Dividend Comparison

Neither LTMAY nor NBIS has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LTMAY and NBIS in my portfolio?

LTMAY and NBIS have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.