LTL vs. NTSD
LTL (ProShares Ultra Telecommunications) and NTSD (WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund) are both Leveraged Equities funds. LTL is passively managed, while NTSD is actively managed. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LTL charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for NTSD.
Performance
LTL vs. NTSD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
LTL
- 1D
- -2.50%
- 1M
- -7.30%
- YTD
- -11.79%
- 6M
- -7.47%
- 1Y
- 15.16%
- 3Y*
- 36.33%
- 5Y*
- 16.49%
- 10Y*
- 9.43%
NTSD
- 1D
- -1.11%
- 1M
- 7.13%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LTL vs. NTSD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
LTL ProShares Ultra Telecommunications | -2.77% |
NTSD WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund | 17.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between LTL and NTSD is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2026 | 0.57 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LTL vs. NTSD — Risk / Return Rank
LTL
NTSD
LTL vs. NTSD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Telecommunications (LTL) and WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund (NTSD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LTL | NTSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.71 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.10 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LTL | NTSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.15 | 5.08 | -4.93 |
Drawdowns
LTL vs. NTSD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LTL drawdown since its inception was -80.20%, which is greater than NTSD's maximum drawdown of -5.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LTL and NTSD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LTL | NTSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.20% | -5.20% | -75.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.43% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.37% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -52.60% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -64.15% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.89% | -1.11% | -13.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.66% | -0.84% | -27.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.25% | — | — |
Volatility
LTL vs. NTSD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LTL | NTSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.57% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.39% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.85% | 24.28% | +2.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.56% | 24.28% | +10.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.96% | 24.28% | +12.68% |
LTL vs. NTSD - Expense Ratio Comparison
LTL has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than NTSD's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
LTL vs. NTSD - Dividend Comparison
LTL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%, while NTSD has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LTL ProShares Ultra Telecommunications | 0.92% | 0.64% | 0.29% | 0.97% | 2.01% | 1.14% | 1.57% | 0.83% | 1.99% | 1.96% | 0.70% | 1.55% |
NTSD WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LTL and NTSD have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NTSD is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NTSD is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for LTL.
LTL has the higher dividend yield at 0.92%, compared with 0.00% for NTSD.
They also come from different issuers: ProShares and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for LTL and 0.35% for NTSD.
Find the right allocation for LTL and NTSD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer