PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LTL vs. KORU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LTL vs. KORU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Telecommunications (LTL) and Direxion Daily South Korea Bull 3X Shares (KORU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LTL achieves a -11.79% return, which is significantly lower than KORU's 559.14% return. Over the past 10 years, LTL has underperformed KORU with an annualized return of 9.43%, while KORU has yielded a comparatively higher 19.62% annualized return.


LTL

1D
-2.50%
1M
-7.30%
YTD
-11.79%
6M
-7.47%
1Y
15.16%
3Y*
36.33%
5Y*
16.49%
10Y*
9.43%

KORU

1D
-2.29%
1M
92.47%
YTD
559.14%
6M
689.29%
1Y
2,160.10%
3Y*
132.56%
5Y*
23.42%
10Y*
19.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LTL vs. KORU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LTL
ProShares Ultra Telecommunications
-11.79%37.06%65.15%62.03%-41.14%40.42%-3.25%30.16%-23.44%-26.85%
KORU
Direxion Daily South Korea Bull 3X Shares
559.14%432.73%-62.18%28.61%-70.16%-33.86%48.78%5.47%-59.89%167.08%

Correlation

The correlation between LTL and KORU is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2013

0.35

The correlation between LTL and KORU shifts across timeframes, from 0.32 (1 year) to 0.47 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

LTL vs. KORU - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
LTL
KORU

Communication Services

57.7%
2.9%

Technology

2.7%
52.3%

Basic Materials

-

2.0%

Consumer Cyclical

-

5.8%

Consumer Defensive

-

1.8%

Energy

-

1.4%

Financial Services

-

16.7%

Healthcare

-

3.5%

Industrials

-

20.4%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

0.4%

Communication Services

LTL
57.7%
KORU
2.9%

Technology

LTL
2.7%
KORU
52.3%

Basic Materials

LTL

-

KORU
2.0%

Consumer Cyclical

LTL

-

KORU
5.8%

Consumer Defensive

LTL

-

KORU
1.8%

Energy

LTL

-

KORU
1.4%

Financial Services

LTL

-

KORU
16.7%

Healthcare

LTL

-

KORU
3.5%

Industrials

LTL

-

KORU
20.4%

Real Estate

LTL

-

KORU

-

Utilities

LTL

-

KORU
0.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LTL vs. KORU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LTL
LTL Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
LTL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LTL Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
LTL Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
LTL Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
LTL Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

KORU
KORU Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
KORU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KORU Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
KORU Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
KORU Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
KORU Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LTL vs. KORU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Telecommunications (LTL) and Direxion Daily South Korea Bull 3X Shares (KORU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LTLKORUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-17.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.72

-0.61

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.71

35.65

-34.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.10

112.99

-110.90

LTL vs. KORU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LTL Sharpe Ratio is 0.57, which is lower than the KORU Sharpe Ratio of 17.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LTL and KORU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LTLKORUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

17.63

-17.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

0.28

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

0.25

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.15

0.13

+0.03

Drawdowns

LTL vs. KORU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LTL drawdown since its inception was -80.20%, smaller than the maximum KORU drawdown of -95.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LTL and KORU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LTLKORUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.20%

-95.79%

+15.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.43%

-61.39%

+39.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.37%

-73.71%

+39.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-52.60%

-93.35%

+40.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.15%

-95.79%

+31.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.89%

-5.39%

-9.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.66%

-57.53%

+28.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.25%

19.33%

-12.08%

Volatility

LTL vs. KORU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Ultra Telecommunications (LTL) is 7.57%, while Direxion Daily South Korea Bull 3X Shares (KORU) has a volatility of 60.18%. This indicates that LTL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KORU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LTLKORUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.57%

60.18%

-52.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.39%

110.71%

-91.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.85%

124.15%

-97.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.56%

85.11%

-50.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.96%

79.91%

-42.95%

LTL vs. KORU - Expense Ratio Comparison

LTL has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than KORU's 1.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

LTL vs. KORU - Dividend Comparison

LTL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%, more than KORU's 0.14% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KORU
Direxion Daily South Korea Bull 3X Shares
0.14%0.89%4.10%2.55%0.48%0.76%0.01%0.93%1.40%3.59%0.00%0.00%
LTL
ProShares Ultra Telecommunications
0.92%0.64%0.29%0.97%2.01%1.14%1.57%0.83%1.99%1.96%0.70%1.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


LTL and KORU have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KORU has higher volatility (60.18%) compared to LTL (7.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LTL dropped -80.20% vs KORU's -95.79%.

On 10-year performance, KORU leads with 19.62% vs 9.43% for LTL. On fees, LTL is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, LTL has been the lower-risk option at 7.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, KORU has performed better with a 19.62% return vs 9.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

LTL is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for KORU.

LTL has the higher dividend yield at 0.92%, compared with 0.14% for KORU.

LTL tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Telecommunications Index (200%), while KORU tracks MSCI Korea 25-50 Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for LTL and 1.29% for KORU.

KORU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (17.63 vs 0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LTL and KORU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer