PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LTL vs. GGLL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LTL vs. GGLL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Telecommunications (LTL) and Direxion Daily GOOGL Bull 2X Shares (GGLL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LTL achieves a -11.79% return, which is significantly lower than GGLL's 22.24% return.


LTL

1D
-2.50%
1M
-7.30%
YTD
-11.79%
6M
-7.47%
1Y
15.16%
3Y*
36.33%
5Y*
16.49%
10Y*
9.43%

GGLL

1D
-1.40%
1M
-13.22%
YTD
22.24%
6M
15.91%
1Y
293.20%
3Y*
65.97%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LTL vs. GGLL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
LTL
ProShares Ultra Telecommunications
-11.79%37.06%65.15%62.03%-6.09%
GGLL
Direxion Daily GOOGL Bull 2X Shares
22.24%123.07%48.88%81.20%-30.35%

Correlation

The correlation between LTL and GGLL is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 8, 2022

0.65

The correlation between LTL and GGLL shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (1 year) to 0.66 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

LTL vs. GGLL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
LTL
GGLL

Communication Services

57.7%
100.0%

Technology

2.7%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Communication Services

LTL
57.7%
GGLL
100.0%

Technology

LTL
2.7%
GGLL

-

Basic Materials

LTL

-

GGLL

-

Consumer Cyclical

LTL

-

GGLL

-

Consumer Defensive

LTL

-

GGLL

-

Energy

LTL

-

GGLL

-

Financial Services

LTL

-

GGLL

-

Healthcare

LTL

-

GGLL

-

Industrials

LTL

-

GGLL

-

Real Estate

LTL

-

GGLL

-

Utilities

LTL

-

GGLL

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LTL vs. GGLL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LTL
LTL Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
LTL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LTL Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
LTL Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
LTL Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
LTL Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

GGLL
GGLL Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
GGLL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GGLL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
GGLL Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
GGLL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
GGLL Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LTL vs. GGLL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Telecommunications (LTL) and Direxion Daily GOOGL Bull 2X Shares (GGLL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LTLGGLLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-4.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.60

-0.49

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.71

7.69

-6.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.10

26.53

-24.43

LTL vs. GGLL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LTL Sharpe Ratio is 0.57, which is lower than the GGLL Sharpe Ratio of 5.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LTL and GGLL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LTLGGLLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

5.07

-4.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.15

0.99

-0.83

Drawdowns

LTL vs. GGLL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LTL drawdown since its inception was -80.20%, which is greater than GGLL's maximum drawdown of -52.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LTL and GGLL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LTLGGLLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.20%

-52.81%

-27.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.43%

-38.39%

+16.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.37%

-52.81%

+18.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-52.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.89%

-21.02%

+6.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.66%

-15.17%

-13.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.25%

11.11%

-3.86%

Volatility

LTL vs. GGLL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Ultra Telecommunications (LTL) is 7.57%, while Direxion Daily GOOGL Bull 2X Shares (GGLL) has a volatility of 16.60%. This indicates that LTL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GGLL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LTLGGLLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.57%

16.60%

-9.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.39%

40.70%

-21.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.85%

58.40%

-31.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.56%

56.03%

-21.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.96%

56.03%

-19.07%

LTL vs. GGLL - Expense Ratio Comparison

LTL has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than GGLL's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

LTL vs. GGLL - Dividend Comparison

LTL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%, less than GGLL's 3.73% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GGLL
Direxion Daily GOOGL Bull 2X Shares
3.73%4.16%3.29%2.05%0.59%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LTL
ProShares Ultra Telecommunications
0.92%0.64%0.29%0.97%2.01%1.14%1.57%0.83%1.99%1.96%0.70%1.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


LTL and GGLL have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GGLL has higher volatility (16.60%) compared to LTL (7.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LTL dropped -80.20% vs GGLL's -52.81%.

On 3-year performance, GGLL leads with 65.97% vs 36.33% for LTL. On fees, LTL is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, LTL has been the lower-risk option at 7.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, GGLL has performed better with a 65.97% return vs 36.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

LTL is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for GGLL.

GGLL has the higher dividend yield at 3.73%, compared with 0.92% for LTL.

LTL tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Telecommunications Index (200%), while GGLL tracks Alphabet Inc. Class A (200%). They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for LTL and 1.05% for GGLL.

GGLL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.07 vs 0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LTL and GGLL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer