LTL vs. GGLL
LTL (ProShares Ultra Telecommunications) and GGLL (Direxion Daily GOOGL Bull 2X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds - LTL tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Select Telecommunications Index (200%) while GGLL tracks the Alphabet Inc. Class A (200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, LTL returned 36.33%/yr vs 65.97%/yr for GGLL. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LTL charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for GGLL.
Performance
LTL vs. GGLL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LTL achieves a -11.79% return, which is significantly lower than GGLL's 22.24% return.
LTL
- 1D
- -2.50%
- 1M
- -7.30%
- YTD
- -11.79%
- 6M
- -7.47%
- 1Y
- 15.16%
- 3Y*
- 36.33%
- 5Y*
- 16.49%
- 10Y*
- 9.43%
GGLL
- 1D
- -1.40%
- 1M
- -13.22%
- YTD
- 22.24%
- 6M
- 15.91%
- 1Y
- 293.20%
- 3Y*
- 65.97%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LTL vs. GGLL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LTL ProShares Ultra Telecommunications | -11.79% | 37.06% | 65.15% | 62.03% | -6.09% |
GGLL Direxion Daily GOOGL Bull 2X Shares | 22.24% | 123.07% | 48.88% | 81.20% | -30.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between LTL and GGLL is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 8, 2022 | 0.65 |
The correlation between LTL and GGLL shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (1 year) to 0.66 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
LTL vs. GGLL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
LTL
GGLL
Communication Services
Technology
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Communication Services
LTL
GGLL
Technology
LTL
GGLL
-
Basic Materials
LTL
-
GGLL
-
Consumer Cyclical
LTL
-
GGLL
-
Consumer Defensive
LTL
-
GGLL
-
Energy
LTL
-
GGLL
-
Financial Services
LTL
-
GGLL
-
Healthcare
LTL
-
GGLL
-
Industrials
LTL
-
GGLL
-
Real Estate
LTL
-
GGLL
-
Utilities
LTL
-
GGLL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LTL vs. GGLL — Risk / Return Rank
LTL
GGLL
LTL vs. GGLL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Telecommunications (LTL) and Direxion Daily GOOGL Bull 2X Shares (GGLL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LTL | GGLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.50 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.97 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.60 | -0.49 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.71 | 7.69 | -6.98 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.10 | 26.53 | -24.43 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LTL | GGLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 | 5.07 | -4.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.15 | 0.99 | -0.83 |
Drawdowns
LTL vs. GGLL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LTL drawdown since its inception was -80.20%, which is greater than GGLL's maximum drawdown of -52.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LTL and GGLL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LTL | GGLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.20% | -52.81% | -27.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.43% | -38.39% | +16.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.37% | -52.81% | +18.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -52.60% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -64.15% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.89% | -21.02% | +6.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.66% | -15.17% | -13.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.25% | 11.11% | -3.86% |
Volatility
LTL vs. GGLL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares Ultra Telecommunications (LTL) is 7.57%, while Direxion Daily GOOGL Bull 2X Shares (GGLL) has a volatility of 16.60%. This indicates that LTL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GGLL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LTL | GGLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.57% | 16.60% | -9.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.39% | 40.70% | -21.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.85% | 58.40% | -31.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.56% | 56.03% | -21.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.96% | 56.03% | -19.07% |
LTL vs. GGLL - Expense Ratio Comparison
LTL has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than GGLL's 1.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
LTL vs. GGLL - Dividend Comparison
LTL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%, less than GGLL's 3.73% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GGLL Direxion Daily GOOGL Bull 2X Shares | 3.73% | 4.16% | 3.29% | 2.05% | 0.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LTL ProShares Ultra Telecommunications | 0.92% | 0.64% | 0.29% | 0.97% | 2.01% | 1.14% | 1.57% | 0.83% | 1.99% | 1.96% | 0.70% | 1.55% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LTL and GGLL have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GGLL has higher volatility (16.60%) compared to LTL (7.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LTL dropped -80.20% vs GGLL's -52.81%.
On 3-year performance, GGLL leads with 65.97% vs 36.33% for LTL. On fees, LTL is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, LTL has been the lower-risk option at 7.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, GGLL has performed better with a 65.97% return vs 36.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
LTL is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for GGLL.
GGLL has the higher dividend yield at 3.73%, compared with 0.92% for LTL.
LTL tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Telecommunications Index (200%), while GGLL tracks Alphabet Inc. Class A (200%). They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for LTL and 1.05% for GGLL.
GGLL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.07 vs 0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LTL and GGLL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer