PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LTIUX vs. URFRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LTIUX vs. URFRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal LifeTime 2035 Fund (LTIUX) and USAA Target Retirement 2040 Fund (URFRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LTIUX achieves a 6.78% return, which is significantly lower than URFRX's 12.10% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with LTIUX having a 9.33% annualized return and URFRX not far behind at 9.25%.


LTIUX

1D
0.64%
1M
0.78%
6M
4.73%
YTD
6.78%
1Y
12.68%
3Y*
13.86%
5Y*
6.53%
10Y*
9.33%
ALL TIME*
7.42%

URFRX

1D
0.76%
1M
1.27%
6M
8.88%
YTD
12.10%
1Y
20.54%
3Y*
15.56%
5Y*
8.35%
10Y*
9.25%
ALL TIME*
7.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

LTIUX vs. URFRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LTIUX
Principal LifeTime 2035 Fund
6.78%14.26%14.13%16.51%-17.48%14.07%15.70%23.48%-7.37%19.69%
URFRX
USAA Target Retirement 2040 Fund
12.10%17.49%10.37%16.75%-14.86%15.88%9.22%19.57%-8.52%18.48%

Correlation

The correlation between LTIUX and URFRX is 0.97 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 4, 2008

0.97

The correlation between LTIUX and URFRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LTIUX vs. URFRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LTIUX
LTIUX Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
LTIUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LTIUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
LTIUX Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
LTIUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
LTIUX Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

URFRX
URFRX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
URFRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
URFRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
URFRX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
URFRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
URFRX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LTIUX vs. URFRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal LifeTime 2035 Fund (LTIUX) and USAA Target Retirement 2040 Fund (URFRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LTIUXURFRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.90

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.40

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.11

3.19

-1.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.04

13.66

-4.62

LTIUX vs. URFRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LTIUX Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is lower than the URFRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LTIUX and URFRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LTIUX vs. URFRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LTIUX drawdown since its inception was -49.65%, which is greater than URFRX's maximum drawdown of -39.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LTIUX and URFRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LTIUXURFRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.65%

-39.33%

-10.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.57%

-6.88%

+0.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.08%

-12.41%

+1.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.23%

-22.27%

-1.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.12%

-28.59%

+0.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.65%

-5.15%

-1.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.53%

1.60%

-0.07%

Volatility

LTIUX vs. URFRX - Volatility Comparison

Principal LifeTime 2035 Fund (LTIUX) and USAA Target Retirement 2040 Fund (URFRX) have volatilities of 2.57% and 2.55%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LTIUXURFRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.57%

2.55%

+0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.73%

8.52%

-0.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.31%

10.22%

-0.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.91%

12.41%

-0.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.43%

13.04%

-0.61%

LTIUX vs. URFRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LTIUX has a 0.01% expense ratio, which is lower than URFRX's 0.02% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

LTIUX vs. URFRX - Dividend Comparison

LTIUX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.46%, more than URFRX's 6.29% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LTIUX
Principal LifeTime 2035 Fund
8.46%9.03%9.46%4.17%7.50%7.06%5.35%7.28%7.75%5.46%4.28%5.59%
URFRX
USAA Target Retirement 2040 Fund
6.29%7.05%2.78%3.94%10.68%7.78%5.49%12.74%9.99%6.53%3.95%2.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, LTIUX and URFRX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

LTIUX has higher volatility (2.57%) compared to URFRX (2.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LTIUX dropped -49.65% vs URFRX's -39.33%.

URFRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LTIUX and URFRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer