LTINX vs. FRQKX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

LTINX (Principal LifeTime 2015 Fund) and FRQKX (Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past 5 years, LTINX returned 4.75%/yr vs 2.96%/yr for FRQKX. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. LTINX charges 0.02%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for FRQKX.

Performance

LTINX vs. FRQKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal LifeTime 2015 Fund (LTINX) and Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K (FRQKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with LTINX having a 4.15% return and FRQKX slightly lower at 4.10%.

LTINX

• 1D: 0.23%
• 1M: 2.03%
• YTD: 4.15%
• 6M: 4.26%
• 1Y: 11.43%
• 3Y*: 10.65%
• 5Y*: 4.75%
• 10Y*: 6.58%

FRQKX

• 1D: 0.21%
• 1M: 1.55%
• YTD: 4.10%
• 6M: 4.33%
• 1Y: 10.54%
• 3Y*: 7.71%
• 5Y*: 2.96%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LTINX vs. FRQKX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
LTINX Principal LifeTime 2015 Fund	4.15%	10.61%	10.67%	11.15%	-13.61%	7.41%	11.87%	4.43%
FRQKX Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K	4.10%	9.91%	4.42%	8.62%	-12.30%	3.95%	9.68%	3.94%

Correlation

The correlation between LTINX and FRQKX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.92
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.91
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2019	0.90

The correlation between LTINX and FRQKX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

LTINX vs. FRQKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LTINX

LTINX Risk / Return Rank: 57
LTINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
LTINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
LTINX Omega Ratio Rank: 60
LTINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
LTINX Martin Ratio Rank: 61

FRQKX

FRQKX Risk / Return Rank: 74
FRQKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
FRQKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
FRQKX Omega Ratio Rank: 79
FRQKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
FRQKX Martin Ratio Rank: 68

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LTINX vs. FRQKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal LifeTime 2015 Fund (LTINX) and Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K (FRQKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LTINX	FRQKX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.21	2.57	-0.35
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.22	3.78	-0.56
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.52	-0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.71	3.12	-0.41
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.04	13.27	-1.23
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LTINX vs. FRQKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LTINX Sharpe Ratio is 2.21, which is comparable to the FRQKX Sharpe Ratio of 2.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LTINX and FRQKX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LTINX	FRQKX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.21	2.57	-0.35
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.65	0.54	+0.12
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.90	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.51	0.78	-0.27

Drawdowns

LTINX vs. FRQKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LTINX drawdown since its inception was -44.03%, which is greater than FRQKX's maximum drawdown of -16.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LTINX and FRQKX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LTINX	FRQKX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-44.03%	-16.97%	-27.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.29%	-3.42%	-0.87%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.16%	-5.17%	-0.99%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.54%	-16.97%	-1.57%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-18.54%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.18%	-3.86%	-1.32%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.96%	0.80%	+0.16%

Volatility

LTINX vs. FRQKX - Volatility Comparison

Principal LifeTime 2015 Fund (LTINX) has a higher volatility of 1.80% compared to Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K (FRQKX) at 1.66%. This indicates that LTINX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FRQKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LTINX	FRQKX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.80%	1.66%	+0.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.30%	3.43%	+0.87%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.25%	4.16%	+1.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.34%	5.56%	+1.78%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.34%	5.76%	+1.58%

LTINX vs. FRQKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LTINX has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is lower than FRQKX's 0.36% expense ratio.

Dividends

LTINX vs. FRQKX - Dividend Comparison

LTINX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.43%, more than FRQKX's 3.22% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FRQKX Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K	3.22%	3.09%	2.91%	2.86%	5.12%	6.11%	3.61%	2.57%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
LTINX Principal LifeTime 2015 Fund	11.43%	11.91%	10.80%	4.75%	7.98%	8.21%	5.51%	12.76%	9.62%	7.62%	3.63%	8.86%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LTINX and FRQKX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, LTINX and FRQKX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, LTINX or FRQKX?

LTINX has higher volatility (1.80%) compared to FRQKX (1.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LTINX dropped -44.03% vs FRQKX's -16.97%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FRQKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs 2.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.