LTINX vs. FRQKX
Compare and contrast key facts about Principal LifeTime 2015 Fund (LTINX) and Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K (FRQKX).
LTINX is managed by Principal. It was launched on Feb 28, 2008. FRQKX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Aug 1, 2019.
Performance
LTINX vs. FRQKX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
LTINX vs. FRQKX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LTINX Principal LifeTime 2015 Fund | -0.85% | 10.61% | 10.67% | 11.15% | -13.61% | 7.41% | 11.87% | 4.43% |
FRQKX Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K | 0.27% | 9.91% | 4.42% | 8.62% | -12.30% | 3.95% | 9.68% | 3.94% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LTINX achieves a -0.85% return, which is significantly lower than FRQKX's 0.27% return.
LTINX
- 1D
- 1.12%
- 1M
- -2.75%
- YTD
- -0.85%
- 6M
- 0.24%
- 1Y
- 8.10%
- 3Y*
- 9.08%
- 5Y*
- 4.22%
- 10Y*
- 6.25%
FRQKX
- 1D
- 0.75%
- 1M
- -2.06%
- YTD
- 0.27%
- 6M
- 1.34%
- 1Y
- 7.69%
- 3Y*
- 6.38%
- 5Y*
- 2.56%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LTINX vs. FRQKX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LTINX has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is lower than FRQKX's 0.36% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
LTINX vs. FRQKX — Risk / Return Rank
LTINX
FRQKX
LTINX vs. FRQKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal LifeTime 2015 Fund (LTINX) and Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K (FRQKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LTINX | FRQKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.27 | 1.73 | -0.45 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.81 | 2.42 | -0.61 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.35 | -0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.71 | 2.37 | -0.66 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.39 | 9.37 | -1.98 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LTINX | FRQKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.27 | 1.73 | -0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 | 0.47 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.86 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 0.70 | -0.21 |
Correlation
The correlation between LTINX and FRQKX is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
LTINX vs. FRQKX - Dividend Comparison
LTINX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.01%, more than FRQKX's 3.24% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LTINX Principal LifeTime 2015 Fund | 12.01% | 11.91% | 10.80% | 4.75% | 7.98% | 8.21% | 5.51% | 12.76% | 9.62% | 7.62% | 3.63% | 8.86% |
FRQKX Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K | 3.24% | 3.09% | 2.91% | 2.86% | 5.12% | 6.11% | 3.61% | 2.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
LTINX vs. FRQKX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LTINX drawdown since its inception was -44.03%, which is greater than FRQKX's maximum drawdown of -16.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LTINX and FRQKX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| LTINX | FRQKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.03% | -16.97% | -27.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.98% | -3.42% | -1.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.54% | -16.97% | -1.57% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.54% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.10% | -2.45% | -0.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.22% | -3.95% | -1.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.15% | 0.86% | +0.29% |
Volatility
LTINX vs. FRQKX - Volatility Comparison
Principal LifeTime 2015 Fund (LTINX) has a higher volatility of 2.75% compared to Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K (FRQKX) at 2.14%. This indicates that LTINX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FRQKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| LTINX | FRQKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.75% | 2.14% | +0.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.97% | 2.96% | +1.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.59% | 4.67% | +1.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.32% | 5.53% | +1.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.32% | 5.77% | +1.55% |