LTINX vs. FRIMX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

LTINX (Principal LifeTime 2015 Fund) and FRIMX (Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement Income Fund Class I) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past 10 years, LTINX returned 6.58%/yr vs 4.21%/yr for FRIMX. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. LTINX charges 0.02%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for FRIMX.

Performance

LTINX vs. FRIMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal LifeTime 2015 Fund (LTINX) and Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement Income Fund Class I (FRIMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with LTINX having a 4.15% return and FRIMX slightly lower at 4.05%. Over the past 10 years, LTINX has outperformed FRIMX with an annualized return of 6.58%, while FRIMX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.21% annualized return.

LTINX

• 1D: 0.23%
• 1M: 2.03%
• YTD: 4.15%
• 6M: 4.26%
• 1Y: 11.43%
• 3Y*: 10.65%
• 5Y*: 4.75%
• 10Y*: 6.58%

FRIMX

• 1D: 0.21%
• 1M: 1.55%
• YTD: 4.05%
• 6M: 4.27%
• 1Y: 10.43%
• 3Y*: 7.59%
• 5Y*: 2.91%
• 10Y*: 4.21%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LTINX vs. FRIMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LTINX Principal LifeTime 2015 Fund	4.15%	10.61%	10.67%	11.15%	-13.61%	7.41%	11.87%	16.32%	-4.72%	13.19%
FRIMX Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement Income Fund Class I	4.05%	9.94%	4.30%	8.06%	-11.66%	2.78%	8.57%	10.57%	-1.82%	7.08%

Correlation

The correlation between LTINX and FRIMX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.92
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.90
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.88
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.86
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 2008	0.93

The correlation between LTINX and FRIMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

LTINX vs. FRIMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LTINX

LTINX Risk / Return Rank: 57
LTINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
LTINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
LTINX Omega Ratio Rank: 60
LTINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
LTINX Martin Ratio Rank: 61

FRIMX

FRIMX Risk / Return Rank: 72
FRIMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
FRIMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
FRIMX Omega Ratio Rank: 78
FRIMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
FRIMX Martin Ratio Rank: 67

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LTINX vs. FRIMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal LifeTime 2015 Fund (LTINX) and Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement Income Fund Class I (FRIMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LTINX	FRIMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.21	2.53	-0.32
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.22	3.72	-0.51
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.51	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.71	3.05	-0.35
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.04	13.04	-1.00
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LTINX vs. FRIMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LTINX Sharpe Ratio is 2.21, which is comparable to the FRIMX Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LTINX and FRIMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LTINX	FRIMX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.21	2.53	-0.32
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.65	0.55	+0.10
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.90	0.94	-0.04
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.51	0.56	-0.05

Drawdowns

LTINX vs. FRIMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LTINX drawdown since its inception was -44.03%, which is greater than FRIMX's maximum drawdown of -33.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LTINX and FRIMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LTINX	FRIMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-44.03%	-33.73%	-10.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.29%	-3.44%	-0.85%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.16%	-4.97%	-1.19%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.54%	-16.12%	-2.42%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-18.54%	-16.12%	-2.42%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.18%	-3.71%	-1.47%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.96%	0.80%	+0.16%

Volatility

LTINX vs. FRIMX - Volatility Comparison

Principal LifeTime 2015 Fund (LTINX) has a higher volatility of 1.80% compared to Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement Income Fund Class I (FRIMX) at 1.65%. This indicates that LTINX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FRIMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LTINX	FRIMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.80%	1.65%	+0.15%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.30%	3.42%	+0.88%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.25%	4.15%	+1.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.34%	5.28%	+2.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.34%	4.52%	+2.82%

LTINX vs. FRIMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LTINX has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is lower than FRIMX's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

LTINX vs. FRIMX - Dividend Comparison

LTINX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.43%, more than FRIMX's 3.08% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FRIMX Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement Income Fund Class I	3.08%	3.11%	3.01%	2.82%	4.52%	3.54%	2.41%	2.56%	4.67%	8.56%	1.67%	1.68%
LTINX Principal LifeTime 2015 Fund	11.43%	11.91%	10.80%	4.75%	7.98%	8.21%	5.51%	12.76%	9.62%	7.62%	3.63%	8.86%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LTINX and FRIMX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, LTINX and FRIMX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, LTINX or FRIMX?

LTINX has higher volatility (1.80%) compared to FRIMX (1.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LTINX dropped -44.03% vs FRIMX's -33.73%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FRIMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 2.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.