PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LTCC vs. ZCSH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LTCC vs. ZCSH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Canary Litecoin ETF (LTCC) and Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC) (ZCSH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LTCC achieves a -38.64% return, which is significantly lower than ZCSH's 41.32% return.


LTCC

1D
-1.79%
1M
-14.54%
YTD
-38.64%
6M
-45.36%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ZCSH

1D
-5.29%
1M
47.90%
YTD
41.32%
6M
72.54%
1Y
1,002.48%
3Y*
185.96%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LTCC vs. ZCSH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
LTCC
Canary Litecoin ETF
-38.64%-22.20%
ZCSH
Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC)
41.32%28.96%

Correlation

The correlation between LTCC and ZCSH is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2025

0.37

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LTCC vs. ZCSH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LTCC

ZCSH
ZCSH Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
ZCSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZCSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZCSH Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
ZCSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZCSH Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LTCC vs. ZCSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Canary Litecoin ETF (LTCC) and Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC) (ZCSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

LTCC vs. ZCSH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LTCCZCSHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-1.11

0.10

-1.21

Drawdowns

LTCC vs. ZCSH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LTCC drawdown since its inception was -56.22%, smaller than the maximum ZCSH drawdown of -93.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LTCC and ZCSH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LTCCZCSHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.22%

-93.73%

+37.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-69.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-71.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-56.22%

-15.71%

-40.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-37.73%

-74.41%

+36.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

35.49%

Volatility

LTCC vs. ZCSH - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LTCCZCSHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

48.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

94.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

64.50%

166.02%

-101.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

64.50%

136.87%

-72.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

64.50%

136.87%

-72.37%

LTCC vs. ZCSH - Expense Ratio Comparison

LTCC has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than ZCSH's 2.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

LTCC vs. ZCSH - Dividend Comparison

Neither LTCC nor ZCSH has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


LTCC and ZCSH have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LTCC is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LTCC is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 2.50% for ZCSH.

LTCC and ZCSH have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Canary Capital and Grayscale. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for LTCC and 2.50% for ZCSH.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LTCC and ZCSH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer