LTCC vs. BLOX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

LTCC (Canary Litecoin ETF) and BLOX (Nicholas Crypto Income ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.63 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. LTCC charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.03%/yr for BLOX.

Performance

LTCC vs. BLOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Canary Litecoin ETF (LTCC) and Nicholas Crypto Income ETF (BLOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LTCC achieves a -41.78% return, which is significantly lower than BLOX's -5.17% return.

LTCC

• 1D: -1.22%
• 1M: 3.26%
• 6M: -31.21%
• YTD: -41.78%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

BLOX

• 1D: -2.47%
• 1M: -3.84%
• 6M: -10.66%
• YTD: -5.17%
• 1Y: -9.46%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 2.29%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BLOX Nicholas Crypto Income ETF	$4.87M	$5.29M	$6.27M
LTCC Canary Litecoin ETF	$109.43K	$173.46K	$179.29K

LTCC vs. BLOX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
LTCC Canary Litecoin ETF	-41.78%	-25.94%
BLOX Nicholas Crypto Income ETF	-5.17%	-29.60%

Correlation

The correlation between LTCC and BLOX is 0.63, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025	0.63

Return for Risk

LTCC vs. BLOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LTCC

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BLOX

BLOX Risk / Return Rank: 8
BLOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
BLOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
BLOX Omega Ratio Rank: 9
BLOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
BLOX Martin Ratio Rank: 7

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LTCC vs. BLOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Canary Litecoin ETF (LTCC) and Nicholas Crypto Income ETF (BLOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LTCC	BLOX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	-0.28	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	-0.02	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.00	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	-0.34	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	-0.62	—

Drawdowns

LTCC vs. BLOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LTCC drawdown since its inception was -62.88%, which is greater than BLOX's maximum drawdown of -47.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LTCC and BLOX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LTCC	BLOX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-62.88%	-47.09%	-15.79%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-47.09%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-58.46%	-34.45%	-24.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-42.19%	-19.83%	-22.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	25.55%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	LTCC	BLOX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	20.64%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	43.34%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	60.92%	57.17%	+3.75%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	60.92%	55.13%	+5.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	60.92%	55.13%	+5.79%

LTCC vs. BLOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LTCC has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than BLOX's 1.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

LTCC vs. BLOX - Dividend Comparison

LTCC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BLOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 50.86%.

Position	TTM	2025
BLOX Nicholas Crypto Income ETF	49.69%	22.69%
LTCC Canary Litecoin ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LTCC and BLOX in my portfolio?

LTCC and BLOX have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, LTCC or BLOX?

On fees, LTCC is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, LTCC or BLOX?

LTCC is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for BLOX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LTCC or BLOX?

BLOX has the higher dividend yield at 49.69%, compared with 0.00% for LTCC.

What is the main difference between LTCC and BLOX?

They also come from different issuers: Canary and Nicholas. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for LTCC and 1.03% for BLOX.