PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LTCC vs. EZPZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LTCC vs. EZPZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Canary Litecoin ETF (LTCC) and Franklin Crypto Index ETF (EZPZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LTCC achieves a -38.64% return, which is significantly lower than EZPZ's -28.21% return.


LTCC

1D
-1.79%
1M
-14.54%
YTD
-38.64%
6M
-45.36%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

EZPZ

1D
-3.03%
1M
-18.55%
YTD
-28.21%
6M
-33.71%
1Y
-39.21%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LTCC vs. EZPZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
LTCC
Canary Litecoin ETF
-38.64%-22.20%
EZPZ
Franklin Crypto Index ETF
-28.21%-24.83%

Correlation

The correlation between LTCC and EZPZ is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2025

0.82

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LTCC vs. EZPZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LTCC

EZPZ
EZPZ Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
EZPZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EZPZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
EZPZ Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
EZPZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
EZPZ Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LTCC vs. EZPZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Canary Litecoin ETF (LTCC) and Franklin Crypto Index ETF (EZPZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

LTCC vs. EZPZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LTCCEZPZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.84

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-1.11

-0.61

-0.50

Drawdowns

LTCC vs. EZPZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LTCC drawdown since its inception was -56.22%, which is greater than EZPZ's maximum drawdown of -52.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LTCC and EZPZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LTCCEZPZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.22%

-52.38%

-3.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-52.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-56.22%

-51.59%

-4.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-37.73%

-21.72%

-16.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

30.44%

Volatility

LTCC vs. EZPZ - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LTCCEZPZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

36.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

64.50%

46.83%

+17.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

64.50%

47.65%

+16.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

64.50%

47.65%

+16.85%

LTCC vs. EZPZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

LTCC has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than EZPZ's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

LTCC vs. EZPZ - Dividend Comparison

Neither LTCC nor EZPZ has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


LTCC and EZPZ have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EZPZ is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EZPZ is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for LTCC.

LTCC and EZPZ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Canary Capital and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for LTCC and 0.19% for EZPZ.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LTCC and EZPZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer