LTCC vs. BTRN

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

LTCC (Canary Litecoin ETF) and BTRN (Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. LTCC is actively managed, while BTRN is passively managed. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.

Performance

LTCC vs. BTRN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Canary Litecoin ETF (LTCC) and Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF (BTRN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LTCC achieves a -41.27% return, which is significantly lower than BTRN's -10.03% return.

LTCC

• 1D: 0.64%
• 1M: -0.57%
• 6M: -37.42%
• YTD: -41.27%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BTRN

• 1D: -0.56%
• 1M: -1.01%
• 6M: -12.18%
• YTD: -10.03%
• 1Y: -25.49%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LTCC vs. BTRN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
LTCC Canary Litecoin ETF	-41.27%	-25.94%
BTRN Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF	-10.03%	-2.98%

Correlation

The correlation between LTCC and BTRN is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025	0.38

Return for Risk

LTCC vs. BTRN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LTCC

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BTRN

BTRN Risk / Return Rank: 0
BTRN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
BTRN Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
BTRN Omega Ratio Rank: 0
BTRN Calmar Ratio Rank: 0
BTRN Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LTCC vs. BTRN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Canary Litecoin ETF (LTCC) and Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF (BTRN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LTCC	BTRN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	-1.49	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	-2.05	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	0.72	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	-0.98	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	-1.54	—

Drawdowns

LTCC vs. BTRN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LTCC drawdown since its inception was -62.88%, which is greater than BTRN's maximum drawdown of -36.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LTCC and BTRN.

Drawdown Indicators

	LTCC	BTRN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-62.88%	-36.97%	-25.91%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-26.03%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-58.10%	-25.90%	-32.20%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-41.26%	-14.96%	-26.30%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	16.63%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	LTCC	BTRN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.11%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	10.16%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	62.36%	17.32%	+45.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	62.36%	30.21%	+32.15%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	62.36%	30.21%	+32.15%

LTCC vs. BTRN - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both LTCC and BTRN have an expense ratio of 0.95%.

Dividends

LTCC vs. BTRN - Dividend Comparison

LTCC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BTRN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 31.20%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
BTRN Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF	31.20%	27.76%	2.56%
LTCC Canary Litecoin ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LTCC and BTRN in my portfolio?

LTCC and BTRN have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, LTCC or BTRN?

Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, LTCC or BTRN?

LTCC and BTRN have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LTCC or BTRN?

BTRN has the higher dividend yield at 31.20%, compared with 0.00% for LTCC.

What is the main difference between LTCC and BTRN?

They also come from different issuers: Canary Capital and Global X.