LTC vs. QDTE

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

LTC (LTC Properties, Inc.) is a stock, while QDTE (Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF) is Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill. Over the past year, LTC returned 6.43% vs 40.36% for QDTE. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

LTC vs. QDTE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in LTC Properties, Inc. (LTC) and Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LTC achieves a 4.55% return, which is significantly lower than QDTE's 16.58% return.

LTC

• 1D: -2.45%
• 1M: -7.84%
• YTD: 4.55%
• 6M: 1.42%
• 1Y: 6.43%
• 3Y*: 8.96%
• 5Y*: 4.44%
• 10Y*: 2.89%

QDTE

• 1D: -0.16%
• 1M: 8.99%
• YTD: 16.58%
• 6M: 16.20%
• 1Y: 40.36%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LTC vs. QDTE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
LTC LTC Properties, Inc.	4.55%	6.17%	14.42%
QDTE Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF	16.58%	19.32%	16.07%

Correlation

The correlation between LTC and QDTE is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.09
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 8, 2024	0.01

Return for Risk

LTC vs. QDTE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LTC

LTC Risk / Return Rank: 50
LTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
LTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
LTC Omega Ratio Rank: 43
LTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
LTC Martin Ratio Rank: 58

QDTE

QDTE Risk / Return Rank: 78
QDTE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
QDTE Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
QDTE Omega Ratio Rank: 78
QDTE Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
QDTE Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LTC vs. QDTE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LTC Properties, Inc. (LTC) and Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LTC	QDTE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.37	2.74	-2.38
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.60	3.49	-2.90
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.08	1.47	-0.40
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.55	3.98	-3.43
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.75	16.08	-14.33
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LTC vs. QDTE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LTC Sharpe Ratio is 0.37, which is lower than the QDTE Sharpe Ratio of 2.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LTC and QDTE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LTC	QDTE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.37	2.74	-2.38
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.21	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.11	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.35	1.30	-0.95

Drawdowns

LTC vs. QDTE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LTC drawdown since its inception was -80.13%, which is greater than QDTE's maximum drawdown of -22.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LTC and QDTE.

Drawdown Indicators

	LTC	QDTE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-80.13%	-22.86%	-57.27%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.82%	-10.20%	-1.62%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.50%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.80%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-51.41%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.82%	-0.16%	-11.66%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.97%	-3.14%	-12.83%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.68%	2.52%	+1.16%

Volatility

LTC vs. QDTE - Volatility Comparison

LTC Properties, Inc. (LTC) has a higher volatility of 5.54% compared to Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE) at 3.75%. This indicates that LTC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QDTE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LTC	QDTE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.54%	3.75%	+1.79%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.04%	11.01%	+3.03%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.64%	14.81%	+2.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.86%	18.43%	+2.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.07%	18.43%	+8.64%

Dividends

LTC vs. QDTE - Dividend Comparison

LTC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.50%, less than QDTE's 42.16% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LTC LTC Properties, Inc.	6.50%	6.63%	6.60%	7.10%	6.42%	6.68%	5.86%	5.09%	5.47%	5.24%	4.66%	4.80%
QDTE Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF	42.16%	49.49%	32.09%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LTC and QDTE in my portfolio?

LTC and QDTE have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LTC or QDTE?

LTC has higher volatility (5.54%) compared to QDTE (3.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LTC dropped -80.13% vs QDTE's -22.86%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QDTE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.74 vs 0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.