LTAX vs. GUMI
LTAX (Nomura Tax-Free USA ETF) and GUMI (Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Municipal Income ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LTAX charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.16%/yr for GUMI.
Performance
LTAX vs. GUMI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
LTAX
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- 2.27%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GUMI
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.31%
- YTD
- 1.28%
- 6M
- 1.38%
- 1Y
- 3.14%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LTAX vs. GUMI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
LTAX Nomura Tax-Free USA ETF | 2.33% |
GUMI Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Municipal Income ETF | 1.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between LTAX and GUMI is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2026 | 0.43 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LTAX vs. GUMI — Risk / Return Rank
LTAX
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
GUMI
LTAX vs. GUMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nomura Tax-Free USA ETF (LTAX) and Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Municipal Income ETF (GUMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LTAX | GUMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.65 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 8.82 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 38.16 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LTAX vs. GUMI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LTAX drawdown since its inception was -3.18%, which is greater than GUMI's maximum drawdown of -0.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LTAX and GUMI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LTAX | GUMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.18% | -0.48% | -2.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.36% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.64% | -0.05% | -0.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.08% | — |
Volatility
LTAX vs. GUMI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LTAX | GUMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.20% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.51% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.73% | 1.07% | +4.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.73% | 0.98% | +4.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.73% | 0.98% | +4.75% |
LTAX vs. GUMI - Expense Ratio Comparison
LTAX has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than GUMI's 0.16% expense ratio.
Dividends
LTAX vs. GUMI - Dividend Comparison
LTAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.33%, less than GUMI's 2.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
GUMI Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Municipal Income ETF | 2.77% | 2.95% | 1.37% |
LTAX Nomura Tax-Free USA ETF | 1.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LTAX and GUMI have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GUMI is cheaper at 0.16% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GUMI is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for LTAX.
GUMI has the higher dividend yield at 2.77%, compared with 1.33% for LTAX.
They also come from different issuers: Nomura and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for LTAX and 0.16% for GUMI.
Find the right allocation for LTAX and GUMI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer