LTAX vs. EMEQ

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

LTAX (Nomura Tax-Free USA ETF) and EMEQ (Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LTAX is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by Nomura, while EMEQ is a Emerging Markets Equities fund actively managed by Nomura. Both are actively managed. Their 0.35 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. LTAX charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.86%/yr for EMEQ.

Performance

LTAX vs. EMEQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nomura Tax-Free USA ETF (LTAX) and Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF (EMEQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

LTAX

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: -2.13%
• 6M: 0.83%
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

EMEQ

• 1D: 1.33%
• 1M: -8.23%
• 6M: 30.45%
• YTD: 53.76%
• 1Y: 110.88%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 65.06%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
EMEQ Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF	$8.75M	$9.16M	$11.52M
LTAX Nomura Tax-Free USA ETF	$8.80K	$7.39K	$9.58K

LTAX vs. EMEQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
LTAX Nomura Tax-Free USA ETF	0.77%
EMEQ Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF	41.47%

Correlation

The correlation between LTAX and EMEQ is 0.35, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2026	0.35

Return for Risk

LTAX vs. EMEQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LTAX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

EMEQ

EMEQ Risk / Return Rank: 91
EMEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
EMEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
EMEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 90
EMEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
EMEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LTAX vs. EMEQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nomura Tax-Free USA ETF (LTAX) and Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF (EMEQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LTAX	EMEQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.69	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.99	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.43	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	4.13	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	15.08	—

Drawdowns

LTAX vs. EMEQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LTAX drawdown since its inception was -3.18%, smaller than the maximum EMEQ drawdown of -26.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LTAX and EMEQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	LTAX	EMEQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.18%	-26.25%	+23.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-26.25%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.22%	-20.86%	+18.64%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.73%	-4.67%	+3.94%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	7.18%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	LTAX	EMEQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	14.87%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	37.54%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.59%	40.39%	-34.80%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.59%	34.15%	-28.56%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.59%	34.15%	-28.56%

LTAX vs. EMEQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

LTAX has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than EMEQ's 0.86% expense ratio.

Dividends

LTAX vs. EMEQ - Dividend Comparison

LTAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.03%, more than EMEQ's 1.79% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
EMEQ Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF	1.79%	2.76%	0.84%
LTAX Nomura Tax-Free USA ETF	2.03%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LTAX and EMEQ in my portfolio?

LTAX and EMEQ have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, LTAX or EMEQ?

On fees, LTAX is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, LTAX or EMEQ?

LTAX is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for EMEQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LTAX or EMEQ?

LTAX has the higher dividend yield at 2.03%, compared with 1.79% for EMEQ.

What is the main difference between LTAX and EMEQ?

LTAX is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while EMEQ is Emerging Markets Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for LTAX and 0.86% for EMEQ.