LSYIX vs. QYLD
LSYIX (Lord Abbett Short Duration High Yield Fund) and QYLD (Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF) are both funds - LSYIX is a High Yield Bonds fund managed by Lord Abbett, while QYLD is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the CBOE NASDAQ-100 Buy Write V2. Over the past 5 years, LSYIX returned 4.68%/yr vs 8.95%/yr for QYLD. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LSYIX charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for QYLD.
Performance
LSYIX vs. QYLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LSYIX achieves a 2.45% return, which is significantly lower than QYLD's 10.20% return.
LSYIX
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 1.08%
- YTD
- 2.45%
- 6M
- 3.31%
- 1Y
- 8.26%
- 3Y*
- 8.65%
- 5Y*
- 4.68%
- 10Y*
- —
QYLD
- 1D
- 2.43%
- 1M
- 4.04%
- YTD
- 10.20%
- 6M
- 10.75%
- 1Y
- 25.53%
- 3Y*
- 14.59%
- 5Y*
- 8.95%
- 10Y*
- 10.07%
LSYIX vs. QYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LSYIX Lord Abbett Short Duration High Yield Fund | 2.45% | 7.71% | 8.65% | 10.63% | -7.19% | 4.69% | 14.35% |
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF | 10.20% | 9.28% | 19.35% | 22.77% | -19.08% | 10.41% | 26.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between LSYIX and QYLD is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2020 | 0.45 |
The correlation between LSYIX and QYLD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.45 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LSYIX vs. QYLD — Risk / Return Rank
LSYIX
QYLD
LSYIX vs. QYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Short Duration High Yield Fund (LSYIX) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LSYIX | QYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.56 | 1.60 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.93 | 5.16 | -2.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.28 | 29.06 | -14.78 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LSYIX vs. QYLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LSYIX drawdown since its inception was -10.79%, smaller than the maximum QYLD drawdown of -24.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSYIX and QYLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LSYIX | QYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.79% | -24.75% | +13.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.83% | -4.97% | +2.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.29% | -19.06% | +13.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -10.79% | -24.61% | +13.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -24.75% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.10% | 0.00% | -0.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.84% | -3.83% | +1.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.58% | 0.88% | -0.30% |
Volatility
LSYIX vs. QYLD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Lord Abbett Short Duration High Yield Fund (LSYIX) is 1.00%, while Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) has a volatility of 4.30%. This indicates that LSYIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LSYIX | QYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.00% | 4.30% | -3.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.81% | 8.24% | -5.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.56% | 9.49% | -5.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.33% | 14.81% | -10.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.22% | 15.54% | -11.32% |
LSYIX vs. QYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
LSYIX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than QYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
LSYIX vs. QYLD - Dividend Comparison
LSYIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.06%, less than QYLD's 11.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LSYIX Lord Abbett Short Duration High Yield Fund | 8.06% | 8.11% | 8.18% | 6.51% | 5.01% | 5.96% | 4.75% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF | 11.22% | 11.55% | 12.50% | 11.78% | 13.75% | 12.85% | 11.16% | 9.84% | 12.44% | 7.69% | 9.15% | 9.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LSYIX and QYLD have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QYLD has higher volatility (4.30%) compared to LSYIX (1.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LSYIX dropped -10.79% vs QYLD's -24.75%.
QYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs 2.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LSYIX and QYLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer