LSVD vs. ENFR

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

LSVD (LSV Disciplined Value ETF) and ENFR (Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LSVD is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by LSV, while ENFR is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Alerian Midstream Energy Select Index. LSVD is actively managed, while ENFR is passively managed. Over the past year, LSVD returned 39.73% vs 24.84% for ENFR. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LSVD charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for ENFR.

Performance

LSVD vs. ENFR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in LSV Disciplined Value ETF (LSVD) and Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LSVD achieves a 15.72% return, which is significantly lower than ENFR's 23.07% return.

LSVD

• 1D: -0.36%
• 1M: 0.57%
• YTD: 15.72%
• 6M: 15.13%
• 1Y: 39.73%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ENFR

• 1D: 1.01%
• 1M: -5.94%
• YTD: 23.07%
• 6M: 24.76%
• 1Y: 24.84%
• 3Y*: 28.26%
• 5Y*: 19.69%
• 10Y*: 11.81%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LSVD vs. ENFR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
LSVD LSV Disciplined Value ETF	15.72%	22.29%	-2.62%
ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF	23.07%	5.88%	1.45%

Correlation

The correlation between LSVD and ENFR is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.08
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2024	0.16

The correlation between LSVD and ENFR shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (1 year) to 0.16 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

LSVD vs. ENFR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	LSVD	ENFR
Technology	38.9%	-
Communication Services	14.3%	-
Consumer Cyclical	11.6%	-
Financial Services	11.5%	0.1%
Healthcare	11.2%	-
Industrials	4.4%	3.4%
Consumer Defensive	2.8%	-
Energy	1.7%	98.5%
Basic Materials	1.5%	-
Real Estate	1.2%	-
Utilities	0.8%	1.4%

Return for Risk

LSVD vs. ENFR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LSVD

LSVD Risk / Return Rank: 90
LSVD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
LSVD Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
LSVD Omega Ratio Rank: 89
LSVD Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
LSVD Martin Ratio Rank: 92

ENFR

ENFR Risk / Return Rank: 50
ENFR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
ENFR Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
ENFR Omega Ratio Rank: 46
ENFR Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
ENFR Martin Ratio Rank: 46

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LSVD vs. ENFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LSV Disciplined Value ETF (LSVD) and Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LSVD	ENFR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.03	1.69	+1.34
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.06	2.35	+1.71
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.53	1.29	+0.24
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.94	2.89	+2.06
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	21.76	7.40	+14.36

LSVD vs. ENFR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LSVD Sharpe Ratio is 3.03, which is higher than the ENFR Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LSVD and ENFR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LSVD vs. ENFR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LSVD drawdown since its inception was -19.30%, smaller than the maximum ENFR drawdown of -68.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSVD and ENFR.

Drawdown Indicators

	LSVD	ENFR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.30%	-68.28%	+48.98%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.07%	-8.64%	+0.57%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-15.58%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-20.29%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-62.64%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.32%	-6.12%	+3.80%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.49%	-15.94%	+13.45%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.83%	3.36%	-1.53%

Volatility

LSVD vs. ENFR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for LSV Disciplined Value ETF (LSVD) is 4.68%, while Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR) has a volatility of 5.42%. This indicates that LSVD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ENFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LSVD	ENFR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.68%	5.42%	-0.74%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.24%	11.57%	-1.33%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.22%	14.82%	-1.60%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.64%	19.24%	-1.60%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.64%	24.68%	-7.04%

LSVD vs. ENFR - Expense Ratio Comparison

LSVD has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than ENFR's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

LSVD vs. ENFR - Dividend Comparison

LSVD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.28%, less than ENFR's 4.08% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF	4.08%	4.77%	4.41%	5.48%	5.23%	7.86%	7.57%	5.81%	3.98%	2.98%	3.31%	3.34%
LSVD LSV Disciplined Value ETF	0.28%	0.32%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LSVD and ENFR in my portfolio?

LSVD and ENFR have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LSVD or ENFR?

ENFR has higher volatility (5.42%) compared to LSVD (4.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LSVD dropped -19.30% vs ENFR's -68.28%.

Which ETF is better, LSVD or ENFR?

On 1-year performance, LSVD leads with 39.73% vs 24.84% for ENFR. On fees, ENFR is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, LSVD has been the lower-risk option at 4.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, LSVD or ENFR?

Over the 1-year period, LSVD has performed better with a 39.73% return vs 24.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, LSVD or ENFR?

ENFR is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for LSVD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LSVD or ENFR?

ENFR has the higher dividend yield at 4.08%, compared with 0.28% for LSVD.

What is the main difference between LSVD and ENFR?

LSVD is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while ENFR is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: LSV and SS&C. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for LSVD and 0.35% for ENFR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LSVD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.03 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.