LST vs. MOO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

LST (Leuthold Select Industries ETF) and MOO (VanEck Agribusiness ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LST is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Leuthold Group, while MOO is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MVIS Global Agribusiness Index. LST is actively managed, while MOO is passively managed. Over the past year, LST returned 34.83% vs 13.06% for MOO. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LST charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for MOO.

Performance

LST vs. MOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leuthold Select Industries ETF (LST) and VanEck Agribusiness ETF (MOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LST achieves a 16.81% return, which is significantly higher than MOO's 10.10% return.

LST

• 1D: -0.18%
• 1M: 7.41%
• YTD: 16.81%
• 6M: 18.46%
• 1Y: 34.83%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MOO

• 1D: 0.48%
• 1M: -4.21%
• YTD: 10.10%
• 6M: 11.54%
• 1Y: 13.06%
• 3Y*: 3.07%
• 5Y*: -0.70%
• 10Y*: 7.00%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LST vs. MOO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
LST Leuthold Select Industries ETF	16.81%	15.64%
MOO VanEck Agribusiness ETF	10.10%	9.31%

Correlation

The correlation between LST and MOO is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.40
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2025	0.47

Return for Risk

LST vs. MOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LST

LST Risk / Return Rank: 73
LST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
LST Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
LST Omega Ratio Rank: 73
LST Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
LST Martin Ratio Rank: 72

MOO

MOO Risk / Return Rank: 27
MOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
MOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
MOO Omega Ratio Rank: 24
MOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
MOO Martin Ratio Rank: 27

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LST vs. MOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leuthold Select Industries ETF (LST) and VanEck Agribusiness ETF (MOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LST	MOO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.44	0.95	+1.50
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.42	1.43	+1.99
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.17	+0.26
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.23	1.55	+1.67
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.38	3.88	+9.50
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LST vs. MOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LST Sharpe Ratio is 2.44, which is higher than the MOO Sharpe Ratio of 0.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LST and MOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LST	MOO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.44	0.95	+1.50
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.04	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.39	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.38	0.22	+1.16

Drawdowns

LST vs. MOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LST drawdown since its inception was -19.47%, smaller than the maximum MOO drawdown of -69.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LST and MOO.

Drawdown Indicators

	LST	MOO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.47%	-69.53%	+50.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.85%	-8.45%	-2.40%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-26.83%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-39.52%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-39.52%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.18%	-17.50%	+17.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.92%	-16.97%	+14.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.61%	3.37%	-0.76%

Volatility

LST vs. MOO - Volatility Comparison

Leuthold Select Industries ETF (LST) and VanEck Agribusiness ETF (MOO) have volatilities of 4.11% and 4.08%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LST	MOO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.11%	4.08%	+0.03%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.72%	10.57%	+1.15%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.33%	13.88%	+0.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.93%	17.12%	+0.81%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.93%	18.19%	-0.26%

LST vs. MOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

LST has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than MOO's 0.55% expense ratio.

Dividends

LST vs. MOO - Dividend Comparison

LST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.15%, less than MOO's 2.24% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LST Leuthold Select Industries ETF	1.15%	1.34%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MOO VanEck Agribusiness ETF	2.24%	2.47%	3.41%	2.93%	2.15%	1.17%	1.10%	1.26%	1.69%	1.44%	2.14%	2.89%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LST and MOO in my portfolio?

LST and MOO have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LST or MOO?

LST has higher volatility (4.11%) compared to MOO (4.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LST dropped -19.47% vs MOO's -69.53%.

Which ETF is better, LST or MOO?

On 1-year performance, LST leads with 34.83% vs 13.06% for MOO. On fees, MOO is cheaper at 0.55% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, LST or MOO?

Over the 1-year period, LST has performed better with a 34.83% return vs 13.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, LST or MOO?

MOO is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for LST.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LST or MOO?

MOO has the higher dividend yield at 2.24%, compared with 1.15% for LST.

What is the main difference between LST and MOO?

LST is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while MOO is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Leuthold Group and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for LST and 0.55% for MOO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LST currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.