PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LSSCX vs. TNVIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LSSCX vs. TNVIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Loomis Sayles Small Cap Value Fund (LSSCX) and 1290 GAMCO Small/Mid Cap Value Fund (TNVIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LSSCX achieves a 20.58% return, which is significantly higher than TNVIX's 18.31% return. Over the past 10 years, LSSCX has underperformed TNVIX with an annualized return of 9.96%, while TNVIX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.62% annualized return.


LSSCX

1D
0.25%
1M
0.37%
6M
12.30%
YTD
20.58%
1Y
24.86%
3Y*
13.37%
5Y*
9.72%
10Y*
9.96%
ALL TIME*
11.41%

TNVIX

1D
-0.90%
1M
-1.78%
6M
9.19%
YTD
18.31%
1Y
31.67%
3Y*
15.68%
5Y*
10.46%
10Y*
11.62%
ALL TIME*
9.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

LSSCX vs. TNVIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LSSCX
Loomis Sayles Small Cap Value Fund
20.58%5.31%10.89%19.39%-11.52%29.03%2.29%25.06%-16.81%10.01%
TNVIX
1290 GAMCO Small/Mid Cap Value Fund
18.31%13.91%11.48%21.31%-11.37%21.85%11.33%19.81%-14.34%19.00%

Correlation

The correlation between LSSCX and TNVIX is 0.76, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 28, 2014

0.91

The correlation between LSSCX and TNVIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (1 year) to 0.91 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LSSCX vs. TNVIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LSSCX
LSSCX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
LSSCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LSSCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
LSSCX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
LSSCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
LSSCX Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

TNVIX
TNVIX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
TNVIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TNVIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
TNVIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
TNVIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
TNVIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LSSCX vs. TNVIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Loomis Sayles Small Cap Value Fund (LSSCX) and 1290 GAMCO Small/Mid Cap Value Fund (TNVIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LSSCXTNVIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.31

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.97

2.95

+0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.29

10.39

-1.10

LSSCX vs. TNVIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LSSCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.71, which is comparable to the TNVIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LSSCX and TNVIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LSSCX vs. TNVIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LSSCX drawdown since its inception was -54.28%, which is greater than TNVIX's maximum drawdown of -42.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSSCX and TNVIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LSSCXTNVIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.28%

-42.75%

-11.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.89%

-10.14%

+0.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.10%

-20.59%

-4.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.10%

-25.61%

+0.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.65%

-42.75%

-1.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.43%

-3.45%

+2.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.55%

-6.15%

-1.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.97%

2.88%

+0.09%

Volatility

LSSCX vs. TNVIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Loomis Sayles Small Cap Value Fund (LSSCX) is 3.22%, while 1290 GAMCO Small/Mid Cap Value Fund (TNVIX) has a volatility of 4.02%. This indicates that LSSCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TNVIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LSSCXTNVIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.22%

4.02%

-0.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.72%

12.46%

-0.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.17%

16.67%

+0.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.77%

19.74%

+1.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.34%

21.10%

+1.24%

LSSCX vs. TNVIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LSSCX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is lower than TNVIX's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

LSSCX vs. TNVIX - Dividend Comparison

LSSCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.51%, more than TNVIX's 3.34% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LSSCX
Loomis Sayles Small Cap Value Fund
14.51%17.50%10.71%20.30%12.74%19.01%8.04%8.65%17.43%12.58%8.27%11.35%
TNVIX
1290 GAMCO Small/Mid Cap Value Fund
3.34%3.95%8.76%3.82%2.51%7.05%0.47%1.74%1.58%1.87%1.79%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


LSSCX and TNVIX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TNVIX has higher volatility (4.02%) compared to LSSCX (3.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LSSCX dropped -54.28% vs TNVIX's -42.75%.

TNVIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 1.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LSSCX and TNVIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer