LSGBX vs. VBTLX

In the year-to-date period, LSGBX achieves a 5.60% return, which is significantly higher than VBTLX's 2.14% return. Over the past 10 years, LSGBX has underperformed VBTLX with an annualized return of 1.10%, while VBTLX has yielded a comparatively higher 1.54% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

LSGBX has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than VBTLX's 0.05% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Loomis Sayles Global Bond Fund (LSGBX) and Vanguard Total Bond Market Index Fund Admiral Shares (VBTLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current LSGBX Sharpe Ratio is 1.21, which is comparable to the VBTLX Sharpe Ratio of 1.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LSGBX and VBTLX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

LSGBX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VBTLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.47%.

The maximum LSGBX drawdown since its inception was -26.86%, which is greater than VBTLX's maximum drawdown of -18.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSGBX and VBTLX.

Loomis Sayles Global Bond Fund (LSGBX) has a higher volatility of 1.86% compared to Vanguard Total Bond Market Index Fund Admiral Shares (VBTLX) at 1.42%. This indicates that LSGBX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VBTLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.