LSSCX vs. DFSCX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

LSSCX (Loomis Sayles Small Cap Value Fund) and DFSCX (DFA U.S. Micro Cap Portfolio) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, LSSCX returned 10.56%/yr vs 11.87%/yr for DFSCX. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. LSSCX charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.41%/yr for DFSCX.

Performance

LSSCX vs. DFSCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Loomis Sayles Small Cap Value Fund (LSSCX) and DFA U.S. Micro Cap Portfolio (DFSCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with LSSCX having a 19.98% return and DFSCX slightly higher at 20.66%. Over the past 10 years, LSSCX has underperformed DFSCX with an annualized return of 10.56%, while DFSCX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.87% annualized return.

LSSCX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 5.43%
• YTD: 19.98%
• 6M: 17.56%
• 1Y: 30.20%
• 3Y*: 16.47%
• 5Y*: 9.37%
• 10Y*: 10.56%

DFSCX

• 1D: 0.16%
• 1M: 4.93%
• YTD: 20.66%
• 6M: 18.44%
• 1Y: 38.20%
• 3Y*: 19.05%
• 5Y*: 9.96%
• 10Y*: 11.87%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LSSCX vs. DFSCX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LSSCX Loomis Sayles Small Cap Value Fund	19.98%	5.31%	10.89%	19.39%	-11.52%	29.03%	2.29%	25.06%	-16.81%	10.01%
DFSCX DFA U.S. Micro Cap Portfolio	20.66%	9.65%	11.43%	17.93%	-12.49%	33.70%	6.61%	20.68%	-11.60%	10.92%

Correlation

The correlation between LSSCX and DFSCX is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.75
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.89
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.93
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 13, 1991	0.92

The correlation between LSSCX and DFSCX shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (1 year) to 0.94 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

LSSCX vs. DFSCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LSSCX

LSSCX Risk / Return Rank: 67
LSSCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
LSSCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
LSSCX Omega Ratio Rank: 51
LSSCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
LSSCX Martin Ratio Rank: 65

DFSCX

DFSCX Risk / Return Rank: 78
DFSCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
DFSCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
DFSCX Omega Ratio Rank: 59
DFSCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
DFSCX Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LSSCX vs. DFSCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Loomis Sayles Small Cap Value Fund (LSSCX) and DFA U.S. Micro Cap Portfolio (DFSCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LSSCX	DFSCX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.17	2.28	-0.12
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.18	3.28	-0.10
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.39	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.85	4.95	-1.10
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.96	16.06	-4.10

LSSCX vs. DFSCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LSSCX Sharpe Ratio is 2.17, which is comparable to the DFSCX Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LSSCX and DFSCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LSSCX vs. DFSCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LSSCX drawdown since its inception was -54.28%, smaller than the maximum DFSCX drawdown of -63.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSSCX and DFSCX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LSSCX	DFSCX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-54.28%	-63.07%	+8.79%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.89%	-8.17%	-1.72%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.10%	-27.01%	+1.91%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.10%	-27.01%	+1.91%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-44.65%	-46.88%	+2.23%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.57%	-9.89%	+2.32%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.00%	2.51%	+0.49%

Volatility

LSSCX vs. DFSCX - Volatility Comparison

Loomis Sayles Small Cap Value Fund (LSSCX) and DFA U.S. Micro Cap Portfolio (DFSCX) have volatilities of 4.34% and 4.54%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LSSCX	DFSCX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.34%	4.54%	-0.20%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.74%	11.91%	+0.83%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.61%	17.75%	-0.14%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.90%	21.00%	-0.10%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.44%	22.66%	-0.22%

LSSCX vs. DFSCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LSSCX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than DFSCX's 0.41% expense ratio.

Dividends

LSSCX vs. DFSCX - Dividend Comparison

LSSCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.58%, more than DFSCX's 0.79% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DFSCX DFA U.S. Micro Cap Portfolio	0.79%	1.03%	0.97%	2.48%	5.16%	10.77%	0.87%	2.80%	5.50%	5.05%	0.90%	6.33%
LSSCX Loomis Sayles Small Cap Value Fund	14.58%	17.50%	10.71%	20.30%	12.74%	19.01%	8.04%	8.65%	17.43%	12.58%	8.27%	11.35%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LSSCX and DFSCX in my portfolio?

LSSCX and DFSCX have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LSSCX or DFSCX?

DFSCX has higher volatility (4.54%) compared to LSSCX (4.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LSSCX dropped -54.28% vs DFSCX's -63.07%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DFSCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 2.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.