LSSAX vs. QDIBX
Compare and contrast key facts about Loomis Sayles Securitized Asset Fund (LSSAX) and Fisher Investments Institutional Group Fixed Income Fund for Retirement Plans (QDIBX).
LSSAX is managed by Loomis Sayles Funds. It was launched on Mar 2, 2006. QDIBX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Dec 13, 2019.
Performance
LSSAX vs. QDIBX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
LSSAX vs. QDIBX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LSSAX Loomis Sayles Securitized Asset Fund | 0.55% | 8.32% | 3.94% | 7.01% | -11.82% | 0.64% | 4.68% | -0.02% |
QDIBX Fisher Investments Institutional Group Fixed Income Fund for Retirement Plans | 0.00% | 7.72% | 1.66% | 6.71% | -14.11% | -0.17% | 6.77% | -0.10% |
Returns By Period
LSSAX
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- -1.13%
- YTD
- 0.55%
- 6M
- 1.86%
- 1Y
- 5.07%
- 3Y*
- 5.46%
- 5Y*
- 1.41%
- 10Y*
- 2.55%
QDIBX
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- -1.22%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 0.90%
- 1Y
- 4.08%
- 3Y*
- 4.27%
- 5Y*
- 0.37%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LSSAX vs. QDIBX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LSSAX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than QDIBX's 0.03% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
LSSAX vs. QDIBX — Risk / Return Rank
LSSAX
QDIBX
LSSAX vs. QDIBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Loomis Sayles Securitized Asset Fund (LSSAX) and Fisher Investments Institutional Group Fixed Income Fund for Retirement Plans (QDIBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LSSAX | QDIBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.46 | 1.06 | +0.40 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.22 | 1.55 | +0.67 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.19 | +0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.63 | 1.81 | +1.82 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.62 | 5.30 | +5.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LSSAX | QDIBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.46 | 1.06 | +0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 | 0.06 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.95 | 0.17 | +0.78 |
Correlation
The correlation between LSSAX and QDIBX is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
LSSAX vs. QDIBX - Dividend Comparison
LSSAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.93%, more than QDIBX's 3.50% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LSSAX Loomis Sayles Securitized Asset Fund | 3.93% | 4.23% | 4.54% | 5.65% | 6.47% | 6.38% | 5.95% | 5.48% | 5.62% | 5.42% | 5.12% | 5.20% |
QDIBX Fisher Investments Institutional Group Fixed Income Fund for Retirement Plans | 3.50% | 3.50% | 3.55% | 3.65% | 2.51% | 1.80% | 3.25% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
LSSAX vs. QDIBX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LSSAX drawdown since its inception was -16.40%, smaller than the maximum QDIBX drawdown of -19.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSSAX and QDIBX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| LSSAX | QDIBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.40% | -19.63% | +3.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.45% | -2.58% | +0.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.40% | -19.63% | +3.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -16.40% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.28% | -1.76% | +0.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.98% | -6.52% | +4.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.84% | 0.88% | -0.04% |
Volatility
LSSAX vs. QDIBX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Loomis Sayles Securitized Asset Fund (LSSAX) is 1.24%, while Fisher Investments Institutional Group Fixed Income Fund for Retirement Plans (QDIBX) has a volatility of 1.46%. This indicates that LSSAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QDIBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| LSSAX | QDIBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.24% | 1.46% | -0.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.68% | 2.54% | +0.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.69% | 4.32% | +0.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.73% | 6.58% | -0.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.39% | 6.32% | -1.93% |