PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LSMIX vs. LSSAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LSMIX vs. LSSAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Loomis Sayles Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund (LSMIX) and Loomis Sayles Securitized Asset Fund (LSSAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LSMIX achieves a 10.17% return, which is significantly higher than LSSAX's 1.24% return. Over the past 10 years, LSMIX has outperformed LSSAX with an annualized return of 11.17%, while LSSAX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.52% annualized return.


LSMIX

1D
0.89%
1M
0.82%
YTD
10.17%
6M
9.19%
1Y
20.70%
3Y*
13.22%
5Y*
4.08%
10Y*
11.17%

LSSAX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.60%
YTD
1.24%
6M
1.22%
1Y
7.13%
3Y*
5.86%
5Y*
1.40%
10Y*
2.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LSMIX vs. LSSAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LSMIX
Loomis Sayles Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund
10.17%5.71%17.74%6.71%-27.08%17.40%31.56%35.21%-7.32%31.80%
LSSAX
Loomis Sayles Securitized Asset Fund
1.24%8.32%3.94%7.01%-11.82%0.64%4.68%6.81%2.48%3.40%

Correlation

The correlation between LSMIX and LSSAX is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.01

Over the past year, LSMIX and LSSAX have become more correlated (0.32) than their long-term average of 0.01, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LSMIX vs. LSSAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LSMIX
LSMIX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
LSMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LSMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
LSMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
LSMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
LSMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

LSSAX
LSSAX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
LSSAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LSSAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
LSSAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
LSSAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
LSSAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LSMIX vs. LSSAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Loomis Sayles Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund (LSMIX) and Loomis Sayles Securitized Asset Fund (LSSAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LSMIXLSSAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.41

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.41

4.05

-1.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.14

13.79

-4.64

LSMIX vs. LSSAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LSMIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.42, which is lower than the LSSAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LSMIX and LSSAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LSMIXLSSAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.42

2.13

-0.71

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

0.25

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

0.58

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.95

-0.42

Drawdowns

LSMIX vs. LSSAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LSMIX drawdown since its inception was -36.96%, which is greater than LSSAX's maximum drawdown of -16.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSMIX and LSSAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LSMIXLSSAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.96%

-16.40%

-20.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.07%

-2.16%

-8.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.39%

-5.91%

-18.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.49%

-16.40%

-19.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.96%

-16.40%

-20.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.03%

-0.61%

-1.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.01%

-1.98%

-8.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.45%

0.90%

+2.55%

Volatility

LSMIX vs. LSSAX - Volatility Comparison

Loomis Sayles Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund (LSMIX) has a higher volatility of 4.94% compared to Loomis Sayles Securitized Asset Fund (LSSAX) at 1.47%. This indicates that LSMIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LSSAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LSMIXLSSAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.94%

1.47%

+3.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.11%

2.66%

+12.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.81%

4.10%

+14.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.41%

5.78%

+15.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.45%

4.42%

+17.03%

LSMIX vs. LSSAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LSMIX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than LSSAX's 0.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

LSMIX vs. LSSAX - Dividend Comparison

LSMIX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LSSAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.34%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LSMIX
Loomis Sayles Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%9.95%0.68%4.40%46.82%0.00%0.18%0.00%
LSSAX
Loomis Sayles Securitized Asset Fund
4.34%4.23%4.54%5.65%6.47%6.38%5.95%5.48%5.62%5.42%5.12%5.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


LSMIX and LSSAX have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LSMIX has higher volatility (4.94%) compared to LSSAX (1.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LSMIX dropped -36.96% vs LSSAX's -16.40%.

LSSAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LSMIX and LSSAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer