PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LSMIX vs. LSBDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LSMIX vs. LSBDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Loomis Sayles Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund (LSMIX) and Loomis Sayles Bond Fund (LSBDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LSMIX achieves a 13.91% return, which is significantly higher than LSBDX's -1.42% return. Over the past 10 years, LSMIX has outperformed LSBDX with an annualized return of 11.43%, while LSBDX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.93% annualized return.


LSMIX

1D
-0.36%
1M
-4.02%
6M
7.44%
YTD
13.91%
1Y
19.71%
3Y*
11.96%
5Y*
3.32%
10Y*
11.43%
ALL TIME*
11.27%

LSBDX

1D
-0.08%
1M
-0.90%
6M
-1.84%
YTD
-1.42%
1Y
2.33%
3Y*
6.29%
5Y*
1.53%
10Y*
2.93%
ALL TIME*
7.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

LSMIX vs. LSBDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LSMIX
Loomis Sayles Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund
13.91%5.71%17.74%6.71%-27.08%17.40%31.56%35.21%-7.32%31.80%
LSBDX
Loomis Sayles Bond Fund
-1.42%8.67%6.70%8.05%-12.50%3.23%2.14%11.72%-2.87%7.47%

Correlation

The correlation between LSMIX and LSBDX is 0.54, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.35

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.41

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016

0.46

The correlation between LSMIX and LSBDX shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (3 years) to 0.54 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LSMIX vs. LSBDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LSMIX
LSMIX Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
LSMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LSMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
LSMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
LSMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
LSMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

LSBDX
LSBDX Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
LSBDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LSBDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
LSBDX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
LSBDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
LSBDX Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LSMIX vs. LSBDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Loomis Sayles Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund (LSMIX) and Loomis Sayles Bond Fund (LSBDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LSMIXLSBDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.14

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.10

0.84

+1.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.24

2.02

+5.22

LSMIX vs. LSBDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LSMIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.18, which is higher than the LSBDX Sharpe Ratio of 0.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LSMIX and LSBDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LSMIX vs. LSBDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LSMIX drawdown since its inception was -36.96%, which is greater than LSBDX's maximum drawdown of -30.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSMIX and LSBDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LSMIXLSBDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.96%

-30.58%

-6.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.07%

-3.25%

-7.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.39%

-4.95%

-19.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.49%

-16.60%

-18.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.96%

-16.60%

-20.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.89%

-2.80%

-3.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.89%

-2.79%

-7.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.00%

1.25%

+1.75%

Volatility

LSMIX vs. LSBDX - Volatility Comparison

Loomis Sayles Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund (LSMIX) has a higher volatility of 4.64% compared to Loomis Sayles Bond Fund (LSBDX) at 0.86%. This indicates that LSMIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LSBDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LSMIXLSBDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.64%

0.86%

+3.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.59%

2.79%

+11.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.77%

3.47%

+16.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.58%

5.03%

+16.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.48%

4.81%

+16.67%

LSMIX vs. LSBDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LSMIX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than LSBDX's 0.67% expense ratio.


Dividends

LSMIX vs. LSBDX - Dividend Comparison

LSMIX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LSBDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.93%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LSBDX
Loomis Sayles Bond Fund
3.93%4.15%5.51%5.09%5.13%2.88%3.83%3.97%3.78%5.86%3.13%7.37%
LSMIX
Loomis Sayles Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%9.95%0.68%4.40%46.82%0.00%0.18%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


LSMIX and LSBDX have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LSMIX has higher volatility (4.64%) compared to LSBDX (0.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LSMIX dropped -36.96% vs LSBDX's -30.58%.

LSMIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.18 vs 0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LSMIX and LSBDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer