PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LSMIX vs. LSIGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LSMIX vs. LSIGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Loomis Sayles Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund (LSMIX) and Loomis Sayles Investment Grade Fixed Income Fund (LSIGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LSMIX achieves a 14.33% return, which is significantly higher than LSIGX's -1.32% return. Over the past 10 years, LSMIX has outperformed LSIGX with an annualized return of 11.32%, while LSIGX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.53% annualized return.


LSMIX

1D
1.79%
1M
-3.67%
6M
6.86%
YTD
14.33%
1Y
20.15%
3Y*
11.96%
5Y*
3.39%
10Y*
11.32%
ALL TIME*
11.31%

LSIGX

1D
0.10%
1M
-1.11%
6M
-1.71%
YTD
-1.32%
1Y
2.07%
3Y*
4.50%
5Y*
0.73%
10Y*
2.53%
ALL TIME*
5.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

LSMIX vs. LSIGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LSMIX
Loomis Sayles Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund
14.33%5.71%17.74%6.71%-27.08%17.40%31.56%35.21%-7.32%31.80%
LSIGX
Loomis Sayles Investment Grade Fixed Income Fund
-1.32%7.15%3.14%8.01%-11.98%0.80%7.18%9.36%-2.08%8.42%

Correlation

The correlation between LSMIX and LSIGX is 0.48, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.29

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.27

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016

0.36

The correlation between LSMIX and LSIGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (5 years) to 0.48 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LSMIX vs. LSIGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LSMIX
LSMIX Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
LSMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LSMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
LSMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
LSMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
LSMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

LSIGX
LSIGX Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
LSIGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LSIGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
LSIGX Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
LSIGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
LSIGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LSMIX vs. LSIGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Loomis Sayles Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund (LSMIX) and Loomis Sayles Investment Grade Fixed Income Fund (LSIGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LSMIXLSIGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.12

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.99

0.78

+1.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.91

1.76

+5.15

LSMIX vs. LSIGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LSMIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.11, which is higher than the LSIGX Sharpe Ratio of 0.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LSMIX and LSIGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LSMIX vs. LSIGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LSMIX drawdown since its inception was -36.96%, which is greater than LSIGX's maximum drawdown of -20.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSMIX and LSIGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LSMIXLSIGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.96%

-20.94%

-16.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.07%

-3.25%

-7.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.39%

-4.51%

-19.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.49%

-15.98%

-19.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.96%

-15.98%

-20.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.55%

-3.00%

-2.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.89%

-2.39%

-7.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.97%

1.34%

+1.63%

Volatility

LSMIX vs. LSIGX - Volatility Comparison

Loomis Sayles Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund (LSMIX) has a higher volatility of 4.70% compared to Loomis Sayles Investment Grade Fixed Income Fund (LSIGX) at 0.94%. This indicates that LSMIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LSIGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LSMIXLSIGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.70%

0.94%

+3.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.70%

2.87%

+11.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.79%

3.76%

+16.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.59%

5.29%

+16.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.48%

4.66%

+16.82%

LSMIX vs. LSIGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LSMIX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than LSIGX's 0.52% expense ratio.


Dividends

LSMIX vs. LSIGX - Dividend Comparison

LSMIX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LSIGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.85%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LSIGX
Loomis Sayles Investment Grade Fixed Income Fund
4.85%4.76%4.69%4.06%4.14%5.95%6.24%2.59%3.42%4.27%4.32%3.81%
LSMIX
Loomis Sayles Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%9.95%0.68%4.40%46.82%0.00%0.18%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


LSMIX and LSIGX have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LSMIX has higher volatility (4.70%) compared to LSIGX (0.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LSMIX dropped -36.96% vs LSIGX's -20.94%.

LSMIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.11 vs 0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LSMIX and LSIGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer