LSMC.DE vs. MWOT.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

LSMC.DE (Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF) and MWOT.DE (Amundi Russell 1000 Growth UCITS ETF Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - LSMC.DE is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment ESG Filtered NET USD Index, while MWOT.DE is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, LSMC.DE returned 130.64% vs 22.79% for MWOT.DE. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LSMC.DE charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for MWOT.DE.

Performance

LSMC.DE vs. MWOT.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF (LSMC.DE) and Amundi Russell 1000 Growth UCITS ETF Acc (MWOT.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

LSMC.DE is traded in EUR, while MWOT.DE is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the MWOT.DE values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LSMC.DE achieves a 63.83% return, which is significantly higher than MWOT.DE's 7.28% return.

LSMC.DE

• 1D: -3.34%
• 1M: 16.45%
• YTD: 63.83%
• 6M: 64.57%
• 1Y: 130.64%
• 3Y*: 62.06%
• 5Y*: 36.20%
• 10Y*: 28.49%

MWOT.DE

• 1D: -0.31%
• 1M: 5.81%
• YTD: 7.28%
• 6M: 6.77%
• 1Y: 22.79%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LSMC.DE vs. MWOT.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
LSMC.DE Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF	63.83%	32.60%	-1.31%
MWOT.DE Amundi Russell 1000 Growth UCITS ETF Acc	7.28%	4.57%	11.79%

Correlation

The correlation between LSMC.DE and MWOT.DE is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.75
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2024	0.74

The correlation between LSMC.DE and MWOT.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

LSMC.DE vs. MWOT.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LSMC.DE

LSMC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 94
LSMC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
LSMC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
LSMC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 91
LSMC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
LSMC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 96

MWOT.DE

MWOT.DE Risk / Return Rank: 40
MWOT.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
MWOT.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
MWOT.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 43
MWOT.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
MWOT.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 35

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LSMC.DE vs. MWOT.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF (LSMC.DE) and Amundi Russell 1000 Growth UCITS ETF Acc (MWOT.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LSMC.DE	MWOT.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	4.27	1.39	+2.89
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.60	1.97	+2.63
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.59	1.25	+0.34
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	10.37	1.56	+8.81
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	32.83	4.36	+28.47
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LSMC.DE vs. MWOT.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LSMC.DE Sharpe Ratio is 4.27, which is higher than the MWOT.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LSMC.DE and MWOT.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LSMC.DE	MWOT.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.27	1.39	+2.89
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.15	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	1.09	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.82	0.61	+0.21

Drawdowns

LSMC.DE vs. MWOT.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LSMC.DE drawdown since its inception was -39.77%, which is greater than MWOT.DE's maximum drawdown of -27.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSMC.DE and MWOT.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	LSMC.DE	MWOT.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.77%	-27.04%	-12.73%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.53%	-14.59%	+2.06%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-36.22%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-39.77%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.77%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.34%	-1.46%	-1.88%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.37%	-6.52%	-2.85%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.96%	5.22%	-1.26%

Volatility

LSMC.DE vs. MWOT.DE - Volatility Comparison

Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF (LSMC.DE) has a higher volatility of 11.23% compared to Amundi Russell 1000 Growth UCITS ETF Acc (MWOT.DE) at 4.15%. This indicates that LSMC.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MWOT.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LSMC.DE	MWOT.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.23%	4.15%	+7.08%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.18%	11.32%	+10.86%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	30.40%	16.38%	+14.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	31.21%	20.73%	+10.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.06%	20.73%	+5.33%

LSMC.DE vs. MWOT.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

LSMC.DE has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than MWOT.DE's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

LSMC.DE vs. MWOT.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither LSMC.DE nor MWOT.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LSMC.DE and MWOT.DE in my portfolio?

LSMC.DE and MWOT.DE have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, LSMC.DE or MWOT.DE?

On fees, MWOT.DE is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, LSMC.DE or MWOT.DE?

MWOT.DE is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for LSMC.DE.

What is the main difference between LSMC.DE and MWOT.DE?

LSMC.DE is categorized as Semiconductors, while MWOT.DE is Large Cap Growth Equities. LSMC.DE tracks MSCI ACWI Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment ESG Filtered NET USD Index, while MWOT.DE tracks Russell 1000 Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for LSMC.DE and 0.19% for MWOT.DE.