LSIOX vs. LSSCX
LSIOX (Loomis Sayles High Income Opps Fund) and LSSCX (Loomis Sayles Small Cap Value Fund) are both mutual funds - LSIOX is a High Yield Bonds fund managed by Loomis Sayles Funds, while LSSCX is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Loomis Sayles Funds. Over the past 10 years, LSIOX returned 5.70%/yr vs 10.27%/yr for LSSCX. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LSIOX charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for LSSCX.
Performance
LSIOX vs. LSSCX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LSIOX achieves a 2.39% return, which is significantly lower than LSSCX's 19.98% return. Over the past 10 years, LSIOX has underperformed LSSCX with an annualized return of 5.70%, while LSSCX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.27% annualized return.
LSIOX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.74%
- YTD
- 2.39%
- 6M
- 2.61%
- 1Y
- 7.90%
- 3Y*
- 9.56%
- 5Y*
- 3.74%
- 10Y*
- 5.70%
LSSCX
- 1D
- 1.52%
- 1M
- 5.43%
- YTD
- 19.98%
- 6M
- 17.22%
- 1Y
- 31.36%
- 3Y*
- 15.61%
- 5Y*
- 9.97%
- 10Y*
- 10.27%
LSIOX vs. LSSCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LSIOX Loomis Sayles High Income Opps Fund | 2.39% | 9.31% | 9.95% | 10.81% | -12.85% | 4.32% | 9.25% | 13.01% | -2.08% | 8.40% |
LSSCX Loomis Sayles Small Cap Value Fund | 19.98% | 5.31% | 10.89% | 19.39% | -11.52% | 29.03% | 2.29% | 25.06% | -16.81% | 10.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between LSIOX and LSSCX is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 27, 2013 | 0.56 |
The correlation between LSIOX and LSSCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LSIOX vs. LSSCX — Risk / Return Rank
LSIOX
LSSCX
LSIOX vs. LSSCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Loomis Sayles High Income Opps Fund (LSIOX) and Loomis Sayles Small Cap Value Fund (LSSCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LSIOX | LSSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.92 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.66 | 1.36 | +0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.27 | 3.87 | +1.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 23.46 | 12.00 | +11.46 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LSIOX vs. LSSCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LSIOX drawdown since its inception was -20.94%, smaller than the maximum LSSCX drawdown of -54.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSIOX and LSSCX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LSIOX | LSSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.94% | -54.28% | +33.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.82% | -9.89% | +8.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.24% | -25.10% | +20.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.13% | -25.10% | +7.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -20.94% | -44.65% | +23.71% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.22% | 0.00% | -0.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.79% | -7.57% | +4.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.38% | 3.00% | -2.62% |
Volatility
LSIOX vs. LSSCX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Loomis Sayles High Income Opps Fund (LSIOX) is 0.85%, while Loomis Sayles Small Cap Value Fund (LSSCX) has a volatility of 4.61%. This indicates that LSIOX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LSSCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LSIOX | LSSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.85% | 4.61% | -3.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.24% | 12.85% | -10.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.10% | 17.61% | -14.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.29% | 20.92% | -15.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.71% | 22.43% | -16.72% |
LSIOX vs. LSSCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LSIOX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than LSSCX's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
LSIOX vs. LSSCX - Dividend Comparison
LSIOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.75%, less than LSSCX's 14.58% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LSIOX Loomis Sayles High Income Opps Fund | 6.75% | 6.39% | 7.34% | 7.31% | 7.32% | 9.02% | 5.58% | 5.62% | 7.50% | 5.64% | 6.03% | 6.18% |
LSSCX Loomis Sayles Small Cap Value Fund | 14.58% | 17.50% | 10.71% | 20.30% | 12.74% | 19.01% | 8.04% | 8.65% | 17.43% | 12.58% | 8.27% | 11.35% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LSIOX and LSSCX have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LSSCX has higher volatility (4.61%) compared to LSIOX (0.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LSIOX dropped -20.94% vs LSSCX's -54.28%.
LSIOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.10 vs 2.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LSIOX and LSSCX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer