LSHIX vs. XILSX
LSHIX (Loomis Sayles Institutional High Income Fund) and XILSX (Pioneer ILS Interval Fund) are both High Yield Bonds funds. Over the past 5 years, LSHIX returned 4.02%/yr vs 12.34%/yr for XILSX. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions. LSHIX charges 0.71%/yr vs 1.88%/yr for XILSX.
Performance
LSHIX vs. XILSX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LSHIX achieves a 1.92% return, which is significantly lower than XILSX's 7.97% return.
LSHIX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.17%
- YTD
- 1.92%
- 6M
- 2.64%
- 1Y
- 8.41%
- 3Y*
- 9.43%
- 5Y*
- 4.02%
- 10Y*
- 5.39%
XILSX
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 0.97%
- YTD
- 7.97%
- 6M
- 10.49%
- 1Y
- 24.81%
- 3Y*
- 19.66%
- 5Y*
- 12.34%
- 10Y*
- —
LSHIX vs. XILSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LSHIX Loomis Sayles Institutional High Income Fund | 1.92% | 9.25% | 9.43% | 10.00% | -11.68% | 8.23% | 3.46% | 10.55% | -3.55% | 5.83% |
XILSX Pioneer ILS Interval Fund | 7.97% | 18.70% | 18.93% | 18.65% | 1.23% | -1.10% | 7.37% | 2.60% | -2.11% | -8.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between LSHIX and XILSX is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2017 | -0.03 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LSHIX vs. XILSX — Risk / Return Rank
LSHIX
XILSX
LSHIX vs. XILSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Loomis Sayles Institutional High Income Fund (LSHIX) and Pioneer ILS Interval Fund (XILSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LSHIX | XILSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.04 | 8.31 | -5.27 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.78 | 83.24 | -78.47 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.68 | 44.25 | -42.58 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.45 | 121.36 | -118.91 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.23 | 830.11 | -817.88 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LSHIX | XILSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.04 | 8.31 | -5.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 | 3.29 | -2.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.90 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.69 | 1.63 | -0.94 |
Drawdowns
LSHIX vs. XILSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LSHIX drawdown since its inception was -40.26%, which is greater than XILSX's maximum drawdown of -14.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSHIX and XILSX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LSHIX | XILSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.26% | -14.53% | -25.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.25% | -0.21% | -2.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.75% | -2.36% | -2.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.18% | -6.27% | -8.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -24.13% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.28% | -4.91% | -2.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.78% | 0.03% | +0.75% |
Volatility
LSHIX vs. XILSX - Volatility Comparison
Loomis Sayles Institutional High Income Fund (LSHIX) has a higher volatility of 0.93% compared to Pioneer ILS Interval Fund (XILSX) at 0.43%. This indicates that LSHIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XILSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LSHIX | XILSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.93% | 0.43% | +0.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.51% | 2.11% | +0.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.36% | 3.09% | +0.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.40% | 3.77% | +1.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.14% | 3.93% | +2.21% |
LSHIX vs. XILSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LSHIX has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is lower than XILSX's 1.88% expense ratio.
Dividends
LSHIX vs. XILSX - Dividend Comparison
LSHIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.66%, less than XILSX's 8.81% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LSHIX Loomis Sayles Institutional High Income Fund | 5.66% | 5.77% | 7.72% | 6.28% | 4.96% | 6.09% | 5.14% | 6.75% | 7.52% | 5.97% | 6.06% | 10.99% |
XILSX Pioneer ILS Interval Fund | 8.81% | 9.51% | 13.06% | 12.82% | 2.68% | 2.04% | 5.20% | 6.63% | 6.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LSHIX and XILSX have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LSHIX has higher volatility (0.93%) compared to XILSX (0.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LSHIX dropped -40.26% vs XILSX's -14.53%.
XILSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (8.31 vs 3.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LSHIX and XILSX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer