PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LSHIX vs. RSIIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LSHIX vs. RSIIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Loomis Sayles Institutional High Income Fund (LSHIX) and RiverPark Strategic Income Fund (RSIIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LSHIX achieves a 1.92% return, which is significantly higher than RSIIX's 1.81% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with LSHIX having a 5.39% annualized return and RSIIX not far behind at 5.27%.


LSHIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.17%
YTD
1.92%
6M
2.64%
1Y
8.41%
3Y*
9.43%
5Y*
4.02%
10Y*
5.39%

RSIIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.18%
YTD
1.81%
6M
2.34%
1Y
5.83%
3Y*
7.23%
5Y*
5.14%
10Y*
5.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LSHIX vs. RSIIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LSHIX
Loomis Sayles Institutional High Income Fund
1.92%9.25%9.43%10.00%-11.68%8.23%3.46%10.55%-3.55%8.41%
RSIIX
RiverPark Strategic Income Fund
1.81%6.04%8.44%9.59%-3.31%11.60%3.42%3.50%1.36%4.84%

Correlation

The correlation between LSHIX and RSIIX is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.37

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2014

0.42

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LSHIX vs. RSIIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LSHIX
LSHIX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
LSHIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LSHIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
LSHIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
LSHIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
LSHIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

RSIIX
RSIIX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
RSIIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSIIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSIIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
RSIIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSIIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LSHIX vs. RSIIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Loomis Sayles Institutional High Income Fund (LSHIX) and RiverPark Strategic Income Fund (RSIIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LSHIXRSIIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.04

1.94

+1.10

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.78

2.55

+2.22

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.68

1.62

+0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.45

3.34

-0.89

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.23

22.60

-10.37

LSHIX vs. RSIIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LSHIX Sharpe Ratio is 3.04, which is higher than the RSIIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LSHIX and RSIIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LSHIXRSIIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.04

1.94

+1.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

2.05

-1.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

1.84

-0.94

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.69

1.68

-0.98

Drawdowns

LSHIX vs. RSIIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LSHIX drawdown since its inception was -40.26%, which is greater than RSIIX's maximum drawdown of -15.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSHIX and RSIIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LSHIXRSIIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.26%

-15.55%

-24.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.25%

-1.79%

-0.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.75%

-1.79%

-2.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.18%

-5.61%

-9.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.13%

-15.55%

-8.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.28%

-1.16%

-6.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.78%

0.26%

+0.52%

Volatility

LSHIX vs. RSIIX - Volatility Comparison

Loomis Sayles Institutional High Income Fund (LSHIX) has a higher volatility of 0.93% compared to RiverPark Strategic Income Fund (RSIIX) at 0.54%. This indicates that LSHIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RSIIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LSHIXRSIIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.93%

0.54%

+0.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.51%

2.83%

-0.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.36%

3.08%

+0.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.40%

2.52%

+2.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.14%

2.88%

+3.26%

LSHIX vs. RSIIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LSHIX has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is lower than RSIIX's 1.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

LSHIX vs. RSIIX - Dividend Comparison

LSHIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.66%, less than RSIIX's 7.41% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LSHIX
Loomis Sayles Institutional High Income Fund
5.66%5.77%7.72%6.28%4.96%6.09%5.14%6.75%7.52%5.97%6.06%10.99%
RSIIX
RiverPark Strategic Income Fund
7.41%7.75%7.67%7.61%6.58%5.12%5.77%4.84%4.59%4.98%5.10%6.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


LSHIX and RSIIX have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LSHIX has higher volatility (0.93%) compared to RSIIX (0.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LSHIX dropped -40.26% vs RSIIX's -15.55%.

LSHIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.04 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LSHIX and RSIIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer